March 2021 - Middle-East - lists.icann.org

DNSSEC and Security Workshop | Wednesday 24 March 2021 | 14.00 - 19.00 UTC
by Fahd Batayneh March 24, 2021

March 24, 2021

Friends and Colleagues, You are invited to attend a series of webinars on DNSSEC and Security Workshop. When: Wednesday 24 March 2021 at 14.00 - 19.00 UTC (TODAY) Where: ZOOM (please check the link here https://70.schedule.icann.org/) The webinar takes place over 3 slots with the first slot for 60 minutes, and slots 2 and 3 for 90 minutes each. Thank you, Fahd Batayneh ICANN

1 0

1st Draft Statement Deadline Extended For ( 3 Days )
by Abdalmonem Galila March 22, 2021

March 22, 2021

Dear ME-Community, I hope my email finds you all well, this is just to let you know that the deadline for submitting the 1st statement draft extended for an extra 3 days keeping other dates as it is and it will be like this :- 09/3 Call for volunteers for the drafting team (6 days) 15/3 Drafting team formation & starting of the statement drafting (7 days) 25/3 First draft put for comments (7 days after the closure of ICANN 70) 05/4 Drafting the updated statement according to the comments received (3 days) 08/4 Posting of the final draft that will be discussed in the ME Space session at ICANN 70 @Amr , @NP, @Zakir, @Dima and @Rolla this is FYI ME Space co-chairs Thanks a lot. All the Best, Abdalmonem Tharwat Galila Deputy Manager, Dot Masr Registry, Operation Sector. [NTRA Logo 2016] National Telecommunication Regulatory Authority [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: 1365523405_telephone] Office Tel.: +2 02 35341582<tel:02%2035341582> - +2 02 35341300<tel:02%2035341300> [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Mobile] Mobile: +2 010 00049068<tel:010%2000049068> [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: ICON] Fax : +2 02 35370537<tel:02%2035370537> [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: oNLINE] Website : http:\\www.mcit.gov.eg<http://www.mcit.gov.eg/> : http:\\www.tra.gov.eg<http://www.mcit.gov.eg/> [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: 1365523294_email] E-mail : agalila(a)mcit.gov.eg<mailto:agalila@mcit.gov.eg> : atharwat(a)tra.gov.eg<mailto:atharwat@tra.gov.eg> [Description: 1447802547_skype] Skype : abdalmonem.galila [Description: static_qr_code_without_logo] [Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: 1365523469_error]DISCLAIMER This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify your system support manager. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the National Telecom Regulatory Authority (NTRA) . Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The NTRA accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. From: Middle-East <middle-east-bounces(a)icann.org> On Behalf Of Dima Samaro via Middle-East Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 02:27 PM To: Middle East ICANN <middle-east(a)icann.org> Cc: rolla hassan <rollah(a)tra.gov.eg> Subject: [ME ICANN] Call for Drafting Team Dear all, As per the discussion on the call (2 March 2021) and on the mailing list, the 3 shortlisted Topics received the following support: · SubPro = 7 (Abdelmonem, Farzaneh, Amr, Manal, NP, Rafik and Zakir) · DNS Abuse = 4 (Nadira, Dima, Rolla and Tijani) · EPDP Ph 2 = 2 (Hadia and Chokri) Therefore, the selected topic to be addressed in the ME Space virtual session is: New gTLD Subsequent Procedure final report. Of course, we will not comment on the 400 pages of the report, but will focus on parts of it. 2 aspects were mentioned: · IDN applications · Applicant support The focus will then be put on the IDN applications and the Applicant Support only. The new timeline is now the following taking into consideration that we will be fully involved in the ICANN 70 virtual meeting (22_25 March) during which we won’t be able to work on the statement: 09/3 Call for volunteers for the drafting team (6 days)  15/3 Drafting team formation & starting of the statement drafting (7 days)  22/3 First draft put for comments (7 days after the closure of ICANN 70)   05/4 Drafting the updated statement according to the comments received (3 days)  08/4 Posting of the final draft that will be discussed in the ME Space session at ICANN 70 This is a call for volunteers to draft the statement. Please send your interest by Sunday 14 March. We expect volunteers not only from the 7 supporters of this topic. Thank you for your contributions. ME Space co-chairs --- Dima Samaro (She/her) e-mail<mailto:samaro.dima@gmail.com> | LinkedIn<https://www.linkedin.com/in/dima-s-4bb90b1a0>

3 2

Call for Drafting Team
by Dima Samaro March 14, 2021

March 14, 2021

Dear all, As per the discussion on the call (2 March 2021) and on the mailing list, the 3 shortlisted Topics received the following support: - *SubPro *= *7* (Abdelmonem, Farzaneh, Amr, Manal, NP, Rafik and Zakir) - *DNS Abuse* = *4* (Nadira, Dima, Rolla and Tijani) - *EPDP Ph 2* = *2* (Hadia and Chokri) Therefore, the selected topic to be addressed in the ME Space virtual session is: *New gTLD Subsequent Procedure final report.*Of course, we will not comment on the 400 pages of the report, but will focus on parts of it. 2 aspects were mentioned: - IDN applications - Applicant support The focus will then be put on the IDN applications and the Applicant Support only. The new timeline is now the following taking into consideration that we will be fully involved in the ICANN 70 virtual meeting (22_25 March) during which we won’t be able to work on the statement: 09/3 Call for volunteers for the drafting team (6 days) 15/3 Drafting team formation & starting of the statement drafting (7 days) 22/3 First draft put for comments (7 days after the closure of ICANN 70) 05/4 Drafting the updated statement according to the comments received (3 days) 08/4 Posting of the final draft that will be discussed in the ME Space session at ICANN 70 This is a call for volunteers to draft the statement. *Please send your interest by Sunday 14 March*. We expect volunteers not only from the 7 supporters of this topic. Thank you for your contributions. ME Space co-chairs --- *Dima Samaro* (She/her) e-mail <samaro.dima(a)gmail.com> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/dima-s-4bb90b1a0>

12 12

PIR Quality Performance Index
by Nadira Alaraj March 10, 2021

March 10, 2021

The Public Internet Registry (PIR) announced an expansion of its Quality Performance Index <http://www.qpi.org/> (QPI) to make it freely available to other registries seeking to improve and grow the quality of their domain name spaces. This expansion of QPI will enable other registries to adapt the QPI roadmap and toolkits so they can identify best practices and incentivize registrars to reduce abuse rates and increase renewals. The PIR made the decision to make it freely available after observing its impact on the .ORG domain space: .ORG remains the least abused of all large generic top-level domains (gTLDs); participating registrars saw a marked improvement (4 percent) in renewal rates; and approximately 50 percent of all new .ORGs were registered through the QPI program. --

1 0

Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended
by Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi March 8, 2021

March 8, 2021

Hi Amr, Thank you for the clarification. In relation to the importance, I think all 3 proposed topics are indeed important. As for the EPDP Phase 2 final report and the subsequent procedures final report being at the same stage, this I do not agree to. They are both at the same stage only in the sense that they are both going to be considered by the board. However, the public comment period in relation to the subsequent procedures has already concluded, that is the community input has already been provided. As for the EPDP Phase 2 recommendations final report the public comment period is still open, that is we as a community still have a chance to comment, so there lies the big difference. So again it is not about the importance of the topic, it is about the timing. The time now is for the EPDP phase 2 final report public comment and we have a chance to contribute to this as a community. Why we are choosing to avoid this, is not clear to me. In the end whatever we agree to as a group would be certainly good. Kind regards Hadia From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:amr@unr.com] Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2021 8:46 PM To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi; Rafik Dammak; Tijani BEN JEMAA; middle-east(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended Hi, FWIW, I did say the following when beginning to address the topic of Sub Pro: “New gTLD Subsequent Procedures is the topic I believe we should focus on.” I also explained my reasons for preferring this topic over the other two, so I will not repeat them in this email. However, Rafik’s point on both the EPDP Phase 2 Final Report and Subsequent Procedures Working Group Final Report both being at the same stage of consideration by the ICANN Board is a relevant one to this discussion IMO (if comparisons between the two topics are being made). Having said that, I’m happy with whatever topics the members of this space ultimately choose. They are all important topics. To me, it’s just a matter of prioritizing one over the others. Prioritizing, to me, in this context doesn’t suggest one is more important than the other two. Other factors are more of an issue to me, such as which of these topics is most significant to our region. Sub Pro strikes me as a more significant and pressing issue to the MEAC region than the SSAD or DNS Abuse. Thanks. Amr From: Middle-East <middle-east-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via Middle-East <middle-east(a)icann.org> Reply-To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia(a)tra.gov.eg> Date: Sunday, 7 March 2021 at 12:08 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak(a)gmail.com>, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa(a)topnet.tn>, "middle-east(a)icann.org" <middle-east(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended Dear Rafik, Tijani and all, Rafik, I did not understand Amr's comment as particularly supporting sub pro. In relation to sub pro Amr actually said "It is important to note, however, that if we do develop a statement with the intent of submitting it as part of the current public comment period that we keep in mind that this is an ICANN Board public comment period. That means that it would be largely pointless to suggest amendments to the recommendations. The Board may not amend or create new recommendations, but can always send some back to the GNSO for review, if it chooses to do so" And said in relation to the EPDP ". If we do choose this as a topic, we don’t necessarily need to address every aspect of the SSAD. We can always choose which ones we wish to comment on,. And Tijani, I totally agree we need to present a consensus opinion of the region. All what I am saying is that I am sure we shall always be able to reach consensus in relation to some of the issues related to a certain topic. We do not need to agree on all the issues. The statement can only mention what we agree on. Kind regards Hadia From: Middle-East [mailto:middle-east-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak via Middle-East Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2021 2:31 AM To: Tijani BEN JEMAA Cc: middle-east(a)icann.org Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended Hi all, I support Amr comments and focusing on subpro makes sense. If I am not mistaking EPDP and subpro were both approved by GNSO council but yet by the board. I do believe we will find more consensus and direct impact on regions for issues related to subpro and the implementation matters even more. One example is about applicant support in previous round which was implemented too late even if the JAS WG worked hard and delivered. Best, Rafik On Sat, Mar 6, 2021 at 3:50 Tijani BEN JEMAA via Middle-East <middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org>> wrote: Dear Amr, Hadia and all, Wonderful discussion ! Thank you so much for your contributions. @Amr, the content abuse or regulation is out of our scope. So, no fear from this side. The DNS Abuse is our days discussed in ICANN, but no action or proposal for action is done yet. So, our region consencus position could be brought to the debate. For the New gTLD Subsequent Procedure, as you rightly said, our statement will have very few effect if not no effect since the final report has been already adopted by the board. @Hadia, as per the ME Space charter, the objective of our work is to express the consensus opinion of the region. If we don't reach consensus, we can't issue a statement with the region position and thus, it won't have any effect. Of course, we can organize sessions out of the ICANN meetings with the purpose of discussion different opinions without issueing a statement. I hope to receive other contributions so that we can agree all on a topic by the week-end. Best Chokri Ben Romdhane <chokribr(a)gmail.com<mailto:chokribr@gmail.com>> a écrit : Dear Hadia, Thank you very much for the clarification, indeed and as I mentioned during the call, the SSAD is a crucial element in EPDP team work and commenting this topic is an urgent needs since the comment period will be closed at 30/03/2021 , and I don't think that our community will have another opportunity to make her voice heard about this topic. Friendly Chokri Le jeu. 4 mars 2021 à 09:55, Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi via Middle-East <middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org>> a écrit : Hi All, Thank you Tijani for sharing a summary about the proposed topics, this is really helpful. Apologies for not being able to join the call. I listened to part of it and intend to continue listening to the rest today or tomorrow at most. So, I would like to share my view in relation to the three proposed topics from a different aspect. I would like to look at the three proposals not in relation to how much consensus the community has in relation to any of them or how much the topic is controversial. At some point we need as a community to start discussing controversial topics. We cannot continue avoiding them, just because we think we cannot reach some kind of consensus. Having said that, I would like to look at the three topics in terms of current benefit to decision making in relation to ICANN's policy development. So, DNS Abuse: This is indeed an important topic and no matter how controversial it is, we need at some point to start discussing it. However, it is not pressing nor urgent right now. New gTLD subsequent procedures final report: This is also an important topic, but as Amr mentions the public comment period is over and the council has already adopted the report on its last call. Providing guidelines in relation to implementation is important, but doing this after the Board adopts the report makes more sense. I would simply say this is not the right timing for this topic, our statement would neither have an impact on the policy nor the implementation. EPDP Phase 2 final recommendations: An important topic as well, but more importantly it is a timely issue. The report is out for public comment and our statement can have an impact on decision making. It does not matter if we cannot agree on some of the issues discussed in the report. In the end we can submit what we agree on and support as a community. As Amr mentions we do not need to discuss every aspect of the report, we could even discuss the idea itself of having the SSAD. For sure we shall find aspects to which we all agree and can present. To that end, and reading Amr's thoughts in relation to all three topics, I support EPDP phase 2 final recommendations to be our topic. Again, I do not think there is a reason for us to avoid putting out an opinion in relation to a current policy under development. I have always thought that having meaningful impact is what should matter most. Thanks again Tijani for all your support to this group and your extensive work and effort and thank you all for your thoughts. Kind regards Hadia From: Middle-East [mailto:middle-east-bounces@icann.org<mailto:middle-east-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr via Middle-East Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2021 9:53 PM To: Tijani BEN JEMAA; middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org> Cc: rolla hassan Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended Hi, I watched the recording of yesterday’s call, and pretty much agree with most of what was expressed by others. Thanks for sharing the link, Tijani. Here’s my personal take on these 3 topics: 1. Agree that the topic of DNS Abuse is not the ideal one. In general, I believe it might be helpful for the designations commonly used to be revised. DNS Abuse itself should be (as others have said) defined narrowly in the technical scope of ICANN mandate. “Content Abuse” is a term that strikes me as strange. Something more like “illegal content” seems more appropriate to me. I’m not sure how content may be abused in the way the DNS can be. Content can be abusive, but describing it as illegal seems to more accurately describe it. There are more nuances to this, imo. Abusive material or behavior (for lack of a better word or description) like malware or phishing (and spam associated with both) even strike me as content delivered using the DNS. There’s much work that needs to be done on this and I’m not sure we (as a community) might be able to address it to the satisfaction of all parties in the time we have. 2. The EPDP Phase 2 Final Report and Recommendations is likely the most divisive topic we can hope to tackle. In fact, multiple members of the Middle East Space have been involved in this effort and we have disagreed on issues more often than we have agreed. I find it unlikely that we will have a consensus position on the Final Report. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t continue to discuss it among ourselves, but issuing some kind of statement might be challenging. I don’t mind engaging in an attempt to do so, if the Middle East Space decides to tackle it, but we should probably manage our expectations on what we might achieve over the next month if we do. Also noteworthy that this topic is just as substantively complex as any other we may wish to tackle. The Standardized System for Access and Disclosure (SSAD) is the subject of the Phase 2 report. All the recommendations coming out of Phase 2 essentially address features of the SSAD. So limiting our input on this topic to the SSAD doesn’t mean we only need to address a small part of the Report. If we do choose this as a topic, we don’t necessarily need to address every aspect of the SSAD. We can always choose which ones we wish to comment on, but everything in that Report is about the SSAD, and how it is expected to function, how the different parties may use it, how it is expected to be financed, etc… 3. New gTLD Subsequent Procedures is the topic I believe we should focus on. As Tijani suggested, we don’t need to address the entire 400-page report. There are several topics in this Final Report that we can focus on, and which may have a direct impact on our region. IDNs is one. Applicant Support is another. The Sub Pro PDP Working Group also made recommendations on how ICANN should conduct its communication strategy to inform potential applicants. This is something I believe might be relevant to our region if there are to be successful applications for new gTLDs coming out of it. It is important to note, however, that if we do develop a statement with the intent of submitting it as part of the current public comment period that we keep in mind that this is an ICANN Board public comment period. That means that it would be largely pointless to suggest amendments to the recommendations. The Board may not amend or create new recommendations, but can always send some back to the GNSO for review, if it chooses to do so. What we might want to do is provide guidance on how best to implement the recommendations that have been adopted by the GNSO, taking into consideration how the implementation method would be of benefit to the MEAC region. These are just some thoughts I had in reaction to this week’s call, but am happy to discuss further. I hope this helps. Thanks. Amr From: Middle-East <middle-east-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Tijani BEN JEMAA via Middle-East <middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org>> Reply-To: Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa(a)topnet.tn<mailto:tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn>> Date: Tuesday, 2 March 2021 at 11:35 PM To: "middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org>" <middle-east(a)icann.org<mailto:middle-east@icann.org>> Cc: "rollah(a)tra.gov.eg<mailto:rollah@tra.gov.eg>" <rollah(a)tra.gov.eg<mailto:rollah@tra.gov.eg>> Subject: Re: [ME ICANN] Topic selection: deadline extended Dear all, The ME Space community met (virtually) this afternoon to discuss the best topic to be addressed in the ME Space session at ICANN70. After a constructive debate, 3 topics were supported with different degree of support: · DNS Abuse · New gTLD subsequent Procedure · EPDP phase 2 final policy recommendations It was proposed to extend the deadline for topic selection to give those who couldn't attend the call to give their preference. Please give your preferred topic among the 3 above topics by Friday 5 March 2021. To help you understand the context of the proposed topics, here are elements that were raised during the call: · DNS Abuse It’s meant to be Domain Name System abuse only out of any content consideration which is out of ICANN remit. The contracted parties have issued a paper about this topic and we can invite one of them to explain their opinion. Also, “Internet & Jurisdiction” Policy Network is working on this issue trying to give practical ways to address the DNS Abuse. We can also invite either the chair of the group “Domain and Jurisdiction” or the Executive Director of the “Internet & Jurisdiction” Policy Network as a whole. · New gTLD Subsequent Procedure final report There are several parts of this huge report (hundreds of pages) that can be addressed separately. Those who support this topic should identify which part shall we address. · EPDP Phase 2 Final Policy Recommendations The proposal was to give the consensus position of our region about the System for Standardized Access/Disclosure to non-public registration information ("SSAD") which is today under public comment. Best ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tijani BENJEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Telephone: +216 52 385 114 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tijani BENJEMAA Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI) Telephone: +216 52 385 114 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Middle-East mailing list Middle-East(a)icann.org<mailto:Middle-East@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/middle-east _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- Rafik Dammak @rafik "fight for the users"

4 5

[Report] Internet Health Report 2020
by Fahd Batayneh March 8, 2021

March 8, 2021

Friends and Colleagues, The annual Internet Health Report 2020 published by Mozilla is out now, and can be found here >> https://2020.internethealthreport.org/. Thank you, Fahd

1 0

FW: You are Invited to a RIPE NCC and ICANN Joint Webinar on DNSSEC and RPKI
by Fahd Batayneh March 7, 2021

March 7, 2021

Friends and Colleagues, You are invited to a joint webinar by ICANN and RIPE NCC entitled “Hardening the Core of the Internet”. If interested, please read on and attend. We look forward to seeing you at the webinar. Thank you, Fahd Batayneh ICANN Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 6:09 PM Subject: You are invited to a RIPE NCC and ICANN Joint Webinar on DNSSEC and RPKI Dear friends and colleagues, The RIPE NCC and ICANN are organizing a joint webinar under the theme “Hardening the Core of the Internet” that will focus on DNSSEC and RPKI, on Tuesday 4 of March 2021 at 9:00 am UTC. The purpose of this webinar is to help participants gain a better understanding on DNSSEC and RPKI and find solutions to prevent cyberattacks and threats. The link to the webinar platform is: https://ripencc.adobeconnect.com/rpki-dnssec/ Please follow the on-screen instructions and be sure to access the link at least five minutes in advance to test your connection. Feel free to share this invitation with colleagues who might be interested to join the event. See you online. RIPE NCC and ICANN Webinar Team

9 17

FW: Schedule for ICANN70 Virtual Community Forum Now Available
by Fahd Batayneh March 5, 2021

March 5, 2021

For those interested in attending ICANN70 (a virtual meeting) during 22-25 March, the schedule of the meeting is now available. Please read on and act accordingly. Fahd Batayneh ICANN Date: Monday, March 1, 2021 at 8:13 PM Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Schedule for ICANN70 Virtual Community Forum Now Available Schedule for ICANN70 Virtual Community Forum Now Available 01 March 2021 LOS ANGELES – 1 March 2021 – The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has released the schedule for the ICANN70 Community Forum, 22-25 March 2021. Initially planned for Cancún, Mexico, the meeting will take place virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Registration is required to view the schedule. Details and information about remote participation tools, including interpretation, can be found here. Important note: ICANN70 will be held in the UTC -5 (Chetumal) time zone of Cancún. ICANN70 is the fourth virtual ICANN Public Meeting. Developed in collaboration among cross-functional ICANN org teams and community groups, the schedule includes sessions designed to advance the community's policy and technical work. Reminder: ICANN70 Prep Week will take place from 8-11 March 2021. The Prep Week session schedule is available here. You can read more information about Prep Week here. About ICANN ICANN's mission is to help ensure a stable, secure, and unified global Internet. To reach another person on the Internet, you need to type an address – a name or a number – into your computer or other device. That address must be unique so computers know where to find each other. ICANN helps coordinate and support these unique identifiers across the world. ICANN was formed in 1998 as a not-for-profit public-benefit corporation with a community of participants from all over the world.

2 1

Fwd: [Gnso-epdp-team] **REMINDER** Meeting Invitation | Observers | GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2A call | Thursday, 04 March 2021 at 14:00 UTC
by NP Kurtböke March 4, 2021

March 4, 2021

There was plenty of information at this meeting for the ME group to react to. Has any of our group members been? ---------- Forwarded message --------- Gönderen: Julie Bisland via Gnso-epdp-team <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Date: 3 Mar 2021 Çar 16:04 Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] **REMINDER** Meeting Invitation | Observers | GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP-P2A call | Thursday, 04 March 2021 at 14:00 UTC To: gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org <gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org> Cc: gnso-secs(a)icann.org <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Dear all, The next meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2A is scheduled on *Thursday, 04 March 2021 at 14:00 UTC for 90 minutes.* *Main Zoom Webinar link: **https://icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5EY1d3bUxLV2s3UStPS2MxZz09 [icann.zoom.us]* <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/j/92181477886?pwd=TlJHTU5E…> *Passcode: Z@S07?t=v5* Going forward, observers will now join via zoom webinar. Observers will have ability to view member chat and information shared in the zoom webinar room. Observers will not be able to use chat or raise hands. *Before joining the call: * Please send dial out requests to *gnso-secs(a)icann.org* <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> *only* Please be sure you have read the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior [icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/resources/pages/expected-s…> Visit the Wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/UQhtCQ Check your time zone: https://tinyurl.com/yztdeosb [tinyurl.com] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tinyurl.com/yztdeosb__;!!PtGJab4!pJ5Oi_A…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2021 [gnso.icann.org] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calen…> *If you are joining via audio only:* One tap mobile US: +13126266799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# or +13462487799,,92181477886#,,,,,,0#,,3121016458# Webinar ID: 921 8147 7886 Passcode: 3121016458 International numbers available: https://icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI [icann.zoom.us] <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/icann.zoom.us/u/acVxz9PmJI__;!!PtGJab4!p…> Thank you. Kind regards, Andrea _______________________________________________ Gnso-epdp-team mailing list Gnso-epdp-team(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos) You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

1 0

[TODAY] You are Invited to a RIPE NCC and ICANN Joint Webinar on DNSSEC and RPKI
by Fahd Batayneh March 4, 2021

March 4, 2021

Friends and Colleagues, You are invited to a joint webinar by ICANN and RIPE NCC entitled “Hardening the Core of the Internet”. If interested, please read on and attend. We look forward to seeing you at the webinar TODAY at 9.00 AM UTC. Thank you, Fahd Batayneh ICANN Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 6:09 PM Subject: You are invited to a RIPE NCC and ICANN Joint Webinar on DNSSEC and RPKI Dear friends and colleagues, The RIPE NCC and ICANN are organizing a joint webinar under the theme “Hardening the Core of the Internet” that will focus on DNSSEC and RPKI, on Tuesday 4 of March 2021 at 9:00 am UTC. The purpose of this webinar is to help participants gain a better understanding on DNSSEC and RPKI and find solutions to prevent cyberattacks and threats. The link to the webinar platform is: https://ripencc.adobeconnect.com/rpki-dnssec/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/ripencc.adobeconnect.com/rpki-dnssec/__;…> Please follow the on-screen instructions and be sure to access the link at least five minutes in advance to test your connection. Feel free to share this invitation with colleagues who might be interested to join the event. See you online. RIPE NCC and ICANN Webinar Team

1 0