I am agreed on all points including Evan's. Darlene ________________________________ From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Fri 4/20/2007 8:24 AM Cc: NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Action Items RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
-Individuals should predominately represented -organizational membership within an ALS should be OK -this conversation is inflammatory -individual at-large membership should be either a) put into a subgroup or b) referred to an ALS
And I'm agreed with Randy on all points. I would also make explicit that in the case of orgs-within-orgs, the participating subgroups must themselves be membership bodies similar to the existing requirement of ALSs. I wouldn't want this to be used as a backdoor to allow in groups that otherwise would not qualify for acceptance. - Evan _______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP