Danny, You might have a point there. However, why did you not bring it up at the beginning of the process so that constructive progress could have been made on this and postings initiated? Why do you leave it until the last minute and then try to throw up a road block? Why use the complaint process when you could have been part of the solution? D ________________________________ From: Danny Younger [mailto:dannyyounger@yahoo.com] Sent: Fri 6/22/2007 4:23 PM To: Thompson, Darlene; Evan Leibovitch Cc: NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: [NA-ALS] Call for Statements of Interest | NA RALO Seats on ALAC Darlene, The Call for Statements of Interest was not posted on the NARALO website, it was not posted on the ALAC website, it was not posted on the ICANN website; neither was it posted on ICANN's public participation website, nor in the ICANN Blog. It was not in an ICANN newsletter, nor in an ICANN news alert nor in an at-large newsletter. Confining the Call only to subscribers of this list was patently unfair and remains unacceptable. A complaint will be lodged. --- "Thompson, Darlene" <DThompson@gov.nu.ca> wrote:
Evan, I believe that we *have* ratified the OP and Code of Conduct. That didn't need to be approved by ICANN staff as it was the NARALO Operating Principals and Code of Conduct and ICANN has no say in same. The MOU is totally different as it is an agreement between the NARALO and ICANN.
Danny, if outreach was to be done, why was it not done in the last few years when there were people sitting on their hands on this list and not doing it. Outreach is up to the ALSs. If that hasn't been done yet, I cannot see that by throwing up this artificial and transparent roadblock now is acceptable.
I understand how upset you must be at not being approved as an ALS but please stop trying to stymie this process that the majority of us want to pursue.
Darlene Sitting in the Ottawa Airport, waiting for my flight
sigh<
________________________________
From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Fri 6/22/2007 2:20 PM Cc: NA Discuss Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] Fwd: [NA-ALS] Call for Statements of Interest | NA RALO Seats on ALAC
Gareth Shearman wrote:
I was under the impression that we have ratified the operating principles and it is now just the MOU that needs to be finished?
I don't think that anything has been formally ratified -- that requires agreement by both NARALO members and ICANN staff. Having said that, it appears that we've generally agreed on wording for the OP and are close to it on the MOU.
Unless there are some serious roadblocks -- most of which have been cleared AFAIK -- ratification could come as early as the in-person meeting on Sunday.
- Evan
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
--- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
--- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
Draft Code of Conduct: http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
____________________________________________________________________________________ Choose the right car based on your needs. Check out Yahoo! Autos new Car Finder tool. http://autos.yahoo.com/carfinder/