+1 to ombudsman review, if any is necessary, not removal from lists On 06/19/2013 09:54 PM, Danny Younger wrote:
I tend to concur with the viewpoints expressed by both Kieren and Bret. An action by the Chair that would result in a competing candidate's loss of posting privileges during an election cycle is ill-advised. In my view, this is an issue that properly should be forwarded to the Ombudsman's office for impartial/neutral resolution.
The only March 5 message I see from Eric appears to be a reasoned discussion of objections and regional advice. It's also hard to fathom why a complaint from March results in a June suspension. --Wendy
Danny ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------