HI John, As said yesterday. It should be an alternate. In fact, At large is now requiring both a primary and a secondary alternative for each ALS. In some cases they are even asking for two alternates. Please modify the document to include this Best, Judith _________________________________________________________________________ Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO Hellerstein & Associates 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008 Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517 E-mail: Judith@jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/ Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide On 3/29/2017 2:32 PM, John More wrote:
Good point. The question is whether it should be a proxy or an alternative, or both.
John More
On Mar 29, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Gordon Chillcott <gordontc@look.ca> wrote:
I've noticed that 3.2 of the proposed ROP requires each ALS to select one "voting representative".
There does not seem to be any allowance for a designated proxy in cases where the voting representative is temporarily unable to act for any reason.
In my own case, for example, I am not able to attend the upcoming General Assembly and my ALS has designated another representative.
Gordon Chillcott
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------