I strongly agree with yourself and Michael. Actually, towards the end of the 100 e-mails, there are actually some good suggestions coming forth. It may have been a painful process but sometimes pain=gain. If the PR person at ICANN's only suggestion is censorship then there is a serious problem here. D ________________________________ From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Evan Leibovitch Sent: Sun 2/17/2008 5:59 PM To: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] registrant advisory committee Michael Maranda wrote:
Also, for the record, I am greatly offended by Mr. Kieran McCarthy's tone on the At Large listserv. I will reserve comment on Kieren's general competence, given what were IMO serious mis-handling of a number of issues at the Delhi meeting (translations, web sites, outreach, public feedback, etc.).
On this issue, I strongly agree with Michael. What do others think? I'm fully prepared to escalate Michael's complaint up the ICANN food chain. - Evan ------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... Visit the NA-RALO Wiki at https://st.icann.org/naralo/ ------