Re: [NA-Discuss] FW: Regional Advice for Papergate

Hello folks. Having just been accepted myself, I was hoping to avoid
weighing in heavily on this, but I'm concerned. KnujOn was very engaged
in ICANN activities for a long time before applying for At-Large
membership. I gather from the conversation there is scant evidence of
how Papergate has been involved in ICANN activities or how they would
use the ALS status?

-------------------------------------
Collect, analyze, enforce, repeat...

Garth Bruen
gbruen@knujon.com
http://www.knujon.com
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/4/149/724

Dr. Robert Bruen at:
RSA, San Francisco, CA - April 20-24
https://365.rsaconference.com/index.jspa
Antispyware Coalition, Washington D.C. - May 19
http://www.antispywarecoalition.org/events/index.htm


> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] FW: Regional Advice for Papergate
> From: Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org>
> Date: Tue, April 07, 2009 10:07 am
> To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>
> Cc: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Alan Greenberg wrote:
> > As Darlene said, incorporating but not having any viable organization
> > is not particularly good either. I happen to be associated with a
> > functioning, productive not-for-profit (far from the ICANN world) and
> > I would hope that our not having incorporated (initial and ongoing
> > cost just to high to justify) would not be held against us.
> Correct, and I erred by suggesting that an ALS might need to be
> incorporated. The ICANN rules regarding ALS accreditation explicitly
> make no requirement for legal corporate status.
> > Proof/demonstration of ongoing activities and membership is the key.
> Absolutely agreed.
> - Evan
> ------
> NA-Discuss mailing list
> NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org
> ------