Hi, Not sure this is where it was to be sent. What I valued most about the NAROLO GA was the chance to see the group functioning as a group. I am an only an alternate member of NARALO for ISOC-NY and often am looking elsewhere in ICANN, so perhaps have missed the degree of cooperation on the list. Seeing what sort of group we may be becoming, over the 3 days, was a good thing. Personally I think more time could have been spent on a smaller number of topics, but in general thought the agenda worked out well and was worth the time. I think the combination with an ARIN meeting was brilliant. The At-Large can give advice on any issue related to ICANN's mission in names or numbers, so it is good to be in understanding with our counterpart in the numbers space, not quite a sub-component of ASO, but virtually, sort of. Personally, though a long time subscriber to the policy list, and previous remote attendee, I was happy to finally participate in one. I appreciate their openness and they way their process allowed for our participation. There is a lot to be learned from the way in which they implement the multistakeholder process that i am still digesting. thanks avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus