OK, so on this point, America@Large was formed with the representation of individuals in mind. I'd like that if there are these individuals, we would like to contribute to their representation. -Randy Glass A@L On 4/20/07, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
RJGlass | America@Large wrote:
-Individuals should predominately represented -organizational membership within an ALS should be OK -this conversation is inflammatory -individual at-large membership should be either a) put into a subgroup or b) referred to an ALS
And I'm agreed with Randy on all points.
I would also make explicit that in the case of orgs-within-orgs, the participating subgroups must themselves be membership bodies similar to the existing requirement of ALSs. I wouldn't want this to be used as a backdoor to allow in groups that otherwise would not qualify for acceptance.
- Evan
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica... --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
-- ------------------------- AmericaAtLarge.org RJPacific.com DDMF.org