Correction: I'm in favor of the meeting wherever it's held, as long as it's before San Juan. Also, can we stop copying both NA lists on mails? Can't we assume everybody on NA-Discuss is also on NA-ALS? In this case, why not use NA-Discuss only? _________________________________________ Luc Faubert Conseiller en gouvernance TI et en gestion du changement / IT governance and change management consulting +1 514 236 5129 www.LucFaubert.com www.isoc.qc.ca www.ccig.ca www.maillons.qc.ca
-----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jacob Malthouse Sent: 10 avril 2007 20:43 Cc: NA Discuss; All Accredited At Large Structures ((ALS)) in the North AmericanRegion Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [NA-ALS] Invitation to NARALO face to face meeting
So far we have six in favour of meeting in person in advance of San Juan:
1. Mr. Miranda 2. ISOC Puerto Rico 3. Robert and Luc - provided it's in Montreal 4. Mr. Evans 5. Our intrepid Nunavut rep Darlene
additional takers?
_______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atl arge-lists.icann.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP