Avri I think that we should assume that a proxy or alternate voting representative is in place. However, it would make sense that the ALS needs to communicate to the Secretariat that the alternate or proxy does indeed represent the ALS. Just a thought, since I don’t know how this has been handled in the past. The goal is to encourage participation, so if the past practice was informal, let’s continue. John More
On Mar 31, 2017, at 10:37 AM, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:
Hi,
The same goes for ISOC-NY. I am going to NO as a backup. Guess I shouldn't be if I cannot carry the proxy for our voting representative.
Seems like allowing a secondary who can vote in the absence of the primary would be a good idea.
avri
On 29-Mar-17 14:20, Gordon Chillcott wrote:
I've noticed that 3.2 of the proposed ROP requires each ALS to select one "voting representative".
There does not seem to be any allowance for a designated proxy in cases where the voting representative is temporarily unable to act for any reason.
In my own case, for example, I am not able to attend the upcoming General Assembly and my ALS has designated another representative.
Gordon Chillcott
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------
-- avri@ella.com is going out of use in the near future. Please switch to avri@acm.org
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------