Well, as everybody know, I'm in favour of the f2f meeting. I would also be in favour of the Montreal venue for all of the reasons that Robert mentioned as well as one additional: it will be a lot easier to arrange for French translations in Montreal than in Yonkers (not to mention that it will cut a full day off of my travel time). Darlene Darlene A. Thompson Community Access Program Administrator Nunavut Department of Education/N-CAP c/o P.O. Box 1000, Station 910 Iqaluit, NU X0A 0H0 Phone: (867) 975-6531 Fax: (867) 979-8870 dthompson@gov.nu.ca -----Original Message----- From: na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:na-discuss-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Jacqueline A. Morris Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:19 PM To: 'Wendy Seltzer'; na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; 'At-Large Staff'; travel-staff@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] RSVP deadline irrelevant/changed? So reassured. Jacob had a count of who had voted for a meeting...I think it was 7/12 ALSes plus 2 ALS applicants but then consensus seemed to have been achieved around a teleconference this coming week. Then Robert today sent an email with strong suggestions for moving the meeting to Montreal. So a final decision should be made in the next few days if you want to meet in the beginning of May, as time will be short there. I'd suggest by the middle/end of this week, the group should decide on place and time for a f2f meeting before San Juan. So far you have the Yonkers option and the Montreal option for venue. Jacqueline -----Original Message----- From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy@seltzer.com] Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 6:03 PM To: na-discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org; At-Large Staff; travel-staff@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [NA-Discuss] RSVP deadline irrelevant/changed? Given the amount of on-list discussion regarding whether to have a face-to-face meeting and if so, where and when to have such a meeting, I'd like to suggest to staff that the "April 15" deadline for indicating travel needs -- in an invitation sent April 10 -- is not plausible. Can you please assure the NA list that if there is to be a meeting someplace, failure to respond by the 15th does not waive ICANN travel funding? Thanks, --Wendy -- Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@seltzer.org Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html http://www.chillingeffects.org/ _______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists .ica nn.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date: 4/15/2007 4:22 PM -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.4.0/762 - Release Date: 4/15/2007 4:22 PM _______________________________________________ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists .icann.org --- Draft MoU with ICANN: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU Draft Operating Principles: http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP