Vittorio, Sorry, but I don't see a single RALO engaged in discussions pertaining to policy changes that would better protect registrants in the wake of the RegisterFly mess. I've already proposed that what we need is a policy to govern transfers between registrants at a single registrar so that registrants may invoke a dispute resolution procedure in the event that a registrar replaces a registrant's contact details with that of the registrar (an issue that has come up repeatedly in RegisterFly-related comments). Unfortunately, North American At-Large members would rather be debating the nuances of geographical representation within a RALO instead of acting to put into place a plan to deal with legitimate registrant issues. Once more "structure-building" is taking precedence over real action that could assist the registrant community. I've seen this phenomenon in the IDNO, in ICANNATLARGE, and now in the RALOs... so I'm not surprised... it's a nice way for ICANN to keep the At-Large distracted in their own little sandbox. Too bad that the registrants have to continue to suffer while their purported representatives are busy playing the Internet Governance game. ____________________________________________________________________________________ TV dinner still cooling? Check out "Tonight's Picks" on Yahoo! TV. http://tv.yahoo.com/