The good thing about doing it this way is that you do not have to change anything in BigPulse. -ed On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Evan Leibovitch <evan@telly.org> wrote:
Alan Greenberg wrote:
Automation is nice, but I see no real need to have the cumulative vote carry over to the overall one automatically. Having a person in the middle would be just fine. It depends.
Unaffiliated voters deserve the same level of anonymity afforded the ALS representatives; thus I see merit in automating the process if that is possible.
Perhaps, even if BigPulse says that what Nick wants can't be done, I could envision a more-conventional process involving two parallel BigPulse votes:
- one for unaffiliated members - one for ALSs
Just before the end of ALS voting, the unaffiliated member vote is closed; then the Chair is directed to cast a ballot to that effect in the ALS vote, on behalf of the unaffiliated.
Could that work? It would take away the need for someone to have the burden of forming the caucus, while allowing everyone to have the same level of privacy and time to vote.
- Evan
-- NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication by error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.