Hi all, I agree with the proposal to defer approval as Evan suggest. And if deferral is not an option, we should work on making it an option not to discourage newcomers to submit an application. Louis Houle Evan Leibovitch a écrit :
Darlene wrote:
1. Papergate seems to be registered as a business but has not yet registered as a corporation so we have no proof of its actual existence;
At least in my jurisdiction, an unincorporated registration is little more than a legal alias. So we are indeed likely dealing with an individual and not (yet) a bonafide group.
I guess my major concern is fairness and transparency. When Danny Younger applied to become an ALS as an individual, he was turned down. How is this application any different? Should we be:
1. Accepting this application as an individual and accepting it on this basis; 2. Accepting this application as an ALS; or 3. Rejecting this application.
Choice (1) really isn't applicable, because no approval is required for someone to join as an individual.
My first choice would be to suspend or defer approval until Papergate is incorporated and the appropriate demonstration of ALS eligibility can be validated. If deferral is not an option then IMO this application ought to be rejected, and resubmitted when Papergate is incorporated.
- Evan
------ NA-Discuss mailing list NA-Discuss@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.ica...
Visit the NARALO online at http://www.naralo.org ------