Registrars: The following is the proposed agenda for our upcoming meeting in San Juan on Tuesday, June 26th. For those of you not attending in person, a call-in number will be sent to the Voting List. Thanks. Jon 9:00 - 9:30 Welcome/Announcements/Officer Reports Chair - Jon Nevett Vice Chair - Rob Hall Secretary - Bob Connelly Treasurer - Margie Milam 9:30 - 10:15 GNSO Issues Discussion with Avri Doria the new GNSO Chair GNSO - Ross Rader/Tom Keller/Adrian Kinderis New TLD Task Force Update - Ross/Tom/Adrian Kinderis Whois WG Update - Ross/Tom/Tim Ruiz/Paul Stahura 10:15 - 11:00 ICANN Registrar Liaison Staff - Data Escrow Program (Tim Cole & Mike Zupke) 11:00 - 11:45 ICANN Executive Staff - ICANN Budget (Doug Brent and Kurt Pritz) 11:45 - 12:30 ICANN Executive Staff - RAA Changes (John Jeffrey and Kurt Pritz) 12:30 - 12:45 Working Lunch -- .Asia Presentation on Pioneer Program (Leona Chen) 12:45 - 13:00 Working Lunch -- .Mobi Presentation (Neil Edwards) 13:00 - 13:30 Working Lunch -- Presentation by and Discussion with the Anti-Phishing Working Group 13:30 - 14:00 Preparation for Board Interaction and Discussion Related to Responses to Questions from ICANN Below 14:00 - 15:00 ICANN Board/Registrar Meeting 15:00 - 15:15 Break 15:15 - 15:45 Discussion Related to Board Interaction and Responses to Questions from ICANN below continued 15:45 - 17:00 Discussion of Registrar Constituency Goals, Dues, Budget & Direction (CLOSED SESSION) 17:00 - 17:15 Wrap-up To the ICANN Constituencies, Supporting Organizations and Advisory Groups, Over the past year, the ICANN Meetings Committee has been soliciting information on how to make the public board meetings more efficient and to increase participation. This is a ongoing project and in response to the feedback that has been received, changes are being made to each meeting. For instance, as a part of this event, we have rearranged the schedule to start with public meetings on Monday and significant changes have been made to the methods of remote participation. As part of this ongoing process, we would like each group to evaluate the interaction between the constituency, supporting organization or advisory group that takes place during the meeting. These opportunities to meet should be as productive for each party as possible. Constituency Day is the one day on which most of the groups meet. The questions I would like to ask each constituency to consider are: 1. The purpose of the interaction between the board and the constituency? 2. The best venue for this to occur. Is the constituency meeting the best venue? Would a breakfast, lunch or dinner be better? 3. How much time would be needed for the most optimal interaction? 4. Does the entire board need to meet with the constituency? For instance, could a few members of the board attend different constituency meetings, perhaps allowing them to stay for a longer period of time? 5. Could the board be provided with an agenda before the meeting, identifying topics or concerns that the constituency would like to discuss, allowing the board to be better prepared for the meeting? Any other feedback on the board/constituency interactions? I would like to report back to the Meetings Committee on the feedback that I receive from the various groups at our first telephone conference after San Juan. This would enable us to take the feedback into account for the planning of the Los Angeles meeting?