On May 30, 2025, at 08:34, Wessels, Duane <dwessels@verisign.com> wrote:
On May 28, 2025, at 2:58 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
On May 28, 2025, at 14:02, Wessels, Duane via rssac-caucus <rssac-caucus@icann.org> wrote:
On May 28, 2025, at 11:34 AM, Paul Hoffman via rssac-caucus <rssac-caucus@icann.org> wrote:
Greetings again. During the RSSAC001v3 work party call yesterday, we discussed possibly adding the expectation from RSSAC061 to RSSAC001v3. There was a discussion about whether to add a new section, new callouts in existing sections, or both. My initial proposal is just the first; here is my proposed text.
===== 3.9 Changing IP Addresses
[E.3.9-A] Each RSO is expected to adhere to all of the expectations listed in RSSAC061, "Guidelines for Changing IP Addresses".
RSSAC061 gives guidance and expectations for RSOs that have already changed service IP addresses, and for those that will change service IP addresses in the future. The expectations in RSSAC061 are incorporated here by reference. These expectations can affect those already in Sections 3.2 and 3.3 of this document. =====
Comments are welcome.
--Paul Hoffman
I could probably live with it, but IMO it would be sufficient to say something shorter, like this:
=====
3.9 Other
These other RSSAC publications place additional expectations on RSOs in specific circumstances.
* RSSAC061 "Guidelines for Changing IP Addresses”
=====
You would do that without a called-out expectation? That seems lax to me.
Yes I would. I think it provides sufficient awareness to anyone that needs to be aware of RSSAC061.
What is the sort of situation where you think it is not sufficient?
Non-RSOs reading 001v3 in order to know what RSOs need to do. The rest of 001v3 lists specific things, and this one addtion would be more general (too general for my tastes). I'm not concerned about RSOs: they all understand that they need to follow all relevant RSSAC publications. But Wes has a good point about expectations from 047. I doubt we can define those very well, so saying "here are other RSSAC documents with expectations" might be sufficient for those readers. I want to add more to that one sentence above, but I've tried a few times and they all sound silly, so maybe your wording and a list that contains 047 and 061 is sufficient. --Paul Hoffman