On 24 Aug 2021, at 20:36, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
On Aug 20, 2021, at 4:44 AM, Andrew McConachie <andrew.mcconachie@icann.org> wrote:
Dear RSSAC Caucus Members,
Thanks to everyone who contributed comments and suggestions into the document.
Ken and I worked through them all and have produced a version for the final 48-hour review. A PDF is also attached for your review. <https://docs.google.com/document/d/11slZDTqrcwTwywpbi3JwHuU_FoaoN54u0f3B2UFj...>
Please review and provide any final comments by Tuesday August 24th.
Greetings again. I was not active in the work party, but I have done some review passes on the document late in the process. I still have a deep concern about the part in the middle where timings of some sort from open public resolvers are made. I put a comment in this near-final document, but have not seen any significant discussion. If RSSAC wants to do these probes, it would be really good if their use was explained in the document.
Thank you for your message Paul. The review period for this document ended today. But it sounds like we need more discussion on this point that Paul has brought up. This is the only remaining significant issue left to be resolved in the document, so it would be great if we could resolve it quickly. It seems like there are two options: 1) Add more justification and explanation for why these queries to open resolvers are included. 2) Remove the queries to open resolvers from the document. Please comment on the above. Thanks, Andrew