May 30, 2025
4:04 p.m.
On 2025/05/30 16:34, Wessels, Duane via rssac-caucus wrote:
Yes I would. I think it provides sufficient awareness to anyone that needs to be aware of RSSAC061.
What is the sort of situation where you think it is not sufficient?
I'd note also that one of the most signficant expectations in RSSAC061 is that the former root service address will be operated in accordance with the expectations in RSSAC001. This then gets rather circular if we do any more than draw the reader's attention to RSSAC061. Ray