NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Hello Everyone, I have booked a family holiday around the MDR meeting, so will go in any event (and can only do two days). I think Bill's suggestion is a good one if a number are going to the IGF meeting, so am happy if it is relocated to Europe - but will not be able to attend if it stays on the same date. Sharon Sharon LEMON OBE Deputy Director Cyber and Forensics Serious and Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) 07768 290902 0207 855 2800 -----Original Message----- From: rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org [mailto:rt4-whois-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Emily Taylor Sent: 09 June 2011 10:34 To: Smith, Bill Cc: rt4-whois@icann.org WHOIS Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Notes from 1:1 calls Hi Bill Thanks. You raise a good point about the proximity with the IGF meeting. >From a personal perspective, of course, I would prefer it to be in Europe ;-) The meeting in MdR has been planned since January - the suggestion in the 1:1s was to make it 3 days rather than 2 days. I think this is sensible, as we will have a lot to do. However, the reasoning behind the original choice of MdR is still relevant: - It's much easier and less costly for ICANN to cover (eg hotel rooms, wireless, and audio streaming), and my understanding is that work has already been done in this regard. - The West Coasters and Peter had dreadful jetlag for the London meeting, Sarmad said it was equally as bad to travel to London or LA, and it was thought to be fairer to make the Europeans suffer for once! I'm not sure, apart from you and me, how many others within the RT are planning to attend this year's IGF in Nairobi? On the assumption that it is only we two attending the IGF, I am in favour of holding the arrangement as is. If it turns out that more of us are heading for Nairobi the following week, then it really does make sense to consider an alternative location within the same time zone. Can I have comments from the other members of the RT please? Best, Emily On 8 Jun 2011, at 19:07, Smith, Bill wrote: I noticed that there is a suggestion for a 3-day face-to-face meeting in MDR in September. I assume that would be around 20-22 Sep. Is that correct? Would there be interest in doing this in Europe? I ask because the following week is the IGF and Nairobi is considerably easier to reach from Europe than the West Coast of the US. I could look into our hosting at one of our EU sites (London, Berlin, Paris) if we are interested. On Jun 8, 2011, at 1:54 AM, Emily Taylor wrote: Hi all I've been doing 1:1 calls with many of you over the past few weeks. There are still team members that I have not managed to have calls with. Here are my notes of calls to date. Best, Emily <Notes from 121s.docx> [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk/> _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois _______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois [http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif] 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK telephone: 01865 582 811 mobile: 07540 049 322 emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk> www.etlaw.co.uk<http://www.etlaw.co.uk> This email was received from the INTERNET and scanned by the Government Secure Intranet anti-virus service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) In case of problems, please call your organisation's IT Helpdesk. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. This information is supplied in confidence by SOCA, and is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. It may also be subject to exemption under other UK legislation. Onward disclosure may be unlawful, for example, under the Data Protection Act 1998. Requests for disclosure to the public must be referred to the SOCA FOI single point of contact, by email on PICUEnquiries@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk or by telephoning 0870 268 8677. All E-Mail sent and received by SOCA is scanned and subject to assessment. Messages sent or received by SOCA staff are not private and may be the subject of lawful business monitoring. E-Mail may be passed at any time and without notice to an appropriate branch within SOCA, on authority from the Director General or his Deputy for analysis. This E-Mail and any files transmitted with it are intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender as soon as possible. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.