Hi James, Hi Kathy First of all, many thanks for your work updating this chapter. Having gone through the entire draft report, I'm convinced that we should be hiving most of the detail into appendices, and think that we can do something here with the WHOIS outputs. Great to have them, but I think a placeholder in the text, and explanation would do, then we append the detail. Do you agree? I am interested in carrying forward your categorisation of gaps and the truth table which we discussed in MdR throughout the report - ie we should arrange our gaps according to your alpha beta gamma schema. Best, Emily On 21 October 2011 06:49, James M. Bladel <jbladel@godaddy.com> wrote:
Team:
Hopefully you have all made your way (or are en route) to Dakar. I wish everyone safe and uneventful travels.
Attached, please find the latest version of the "Policy Chapter," which takes in to account feedback and discussions from our meeting in MdR. Note that it is still heavily marked-up, but I believe the final edition is beginning to take shape.
Many thanks to Kathy who stepped up to compensate for my unavailability this week. Thanks Kathy!
J.
_______________________________________________ Rt4-whois mailing list Rt4-whois@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois
-- * * 76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK t: +44 (0)1865 582 811 • m: +44 (0)7540 049 322 emily@emilytaylor.eu *www.etlaw.co.uk* Emily Taylor Consultancy Limited is a company registered in England and Wales No. 730471. VAT No. 114487713.