Dear Review Team Members, Following up on Emily's email, please find attached the San Francisco meeting notes that will be discussed tomorrow during the call. Comments and feedback are more than welcome. The report and San Francisco material are also available on the wiki for your convenience: https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Silicon+Valley+Meeting Thank you, Very best regards Alice From: Emily Taylor <emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk<mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk>> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 09:50:28 -0700 To: RT4 WHOIS <rt4-whois@icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org>> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Proposed agenda for tomorrow's meeting Dear all I've just returned from a few days away, and have been catching up on discussions on the list. Peter - thank you for your suggestion of an issues paper. I think this may be a good opportunity to side-step the difficulties we have discussed (and financial implications) relating to formal questionnaires, and I would be grateful if you would introduce this topic on our next call. I'm aware that the consumer trust subteam, prompted by Sarmad, has continued to work through the issues, and I'd like Sarmad to brief the RT on progress, and a proposed way forward. I would also like us to spend some quality time discussing the draft report outline which I circulated on the list on 22 March, on which there has so far been little comment. Another thing we need to do is plan our time in Singapore carefully. Peter has suggested a session with law enforcement, and we need to think through (1) whether we would find this helpful (2) how to get the most out of such a session and (3) what other stakeholders should participate? So, I attach a draft agenda for your comments, and also a copy of the draft report outline. Kind regards Emily