------------- (06/11/2018 22:06) ------------- Edmon: dennis/sarmad do you have the link handy? Dennis Tan: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VCpLpl9nkHq7D7Pf0gyJm7zSllVC9pLvsu_7YdJ4 73Y/edit?usp=sharing Edmon: thx ------------- (06/11/2018 22:16) ------------- Edmon: not sure if i understood sarmad correctly, but i think it might be useful to distinguish between "variants" such as netherlands vs. holland, and IDN variants that is defined by the LGR, in this case the RZ-LGR... ------------- (06/11/2018 22:17) ------------- Sarmad Hussain: "variants" are by definition those from RZ-LGR. Others should be considered unique TLD labels? ------------- (06/11/2018 22:20) ------------- Dennis Tan: https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-060-en.pdf Mirjana Tasic .rs: I hear you ------------- (06/11/2018 22:30) ------------- Edmon: so 2 specific suggestions: 1. beofre a generation panel is reconvened, the issue raised should be compared with what was already discussed in the generation-integration panel decisions/discussions from before, it should only be reconvened if new information is brought in ------------- (06/11/2018 22:31) ------------- Edmon: 2. do we talk about appeal against integration panel itself and how it comes out with its consensus position Sarmad Hussain: +1 Edmon Sarmad Hussain: (on Edmon's first comment) :-) Edmon: @sarmad understood, 2 was more of a question Sarmad Hussain: IP position is generally explained Sarmad Hussain: GP should be able to ask IP rationale for a decision ------------- (06/11/2018 22:45) ------------- Edmon: sorry, let me type then ------------- (06/11/2018 22:47) ------------- Edmon: suggestion is that whoever comes in with an appeal should present a technically coherent LGR (or part of LGR pertaining the lang/script) as a basic threshold Dennis Tan: sounds like a reasonable ask Edmon: yes agree with sarmad, we shoul dhave examples Sarmad Hussain: Developing an LGR may be too technical for somebody who is appealing Sarmad Hussain: especially from the community Sarmad Hussain: Though the entity appealing must make their case ------------- (06/11/2018 22:52) ------------- Edmon: hmm sarmad, also we might want to distinguish between an update of the LGR initiated by a renewed generation panel vs. an "appeal" Sarmad Hussain: good point. GP can start at any time Edmon: i guess i read appeal as a different thing, and for that we should set some tech bar, because a renewed GP can be convened for consideration of a number of codepoints without a particualr recommended change to the LGR already in place Edmon: but an appeals should be otherwise Sarmad Hussain: yes, agree Wei WANG: I agree ------------- (06/11/2018 22:55) ------------- alireza: thanks Mirjana Tasic .rs: Bye Wei WANG: thanks