Hi kc, I’m not sure where you are seeing a mismatch - the progress spreadsheet seems aligned with the comment spreadsheet as far as I can tell. In the example you pointed to, “Baseline security practices” is item 22 on both. Unless you’re looking at the spreadsheet row number instead of the first column with the recommendation number? Thanks, Heather Heather Flanagan — Translator of Geek to Human https://sphericalcowconsulting.com On Jun 27, 2020, 10:54 PM -0700, k claffy <kc@caida.org>, wrote:
The progress chart numbering of recommendations doesn't match the public comment numbering: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1DQpPA0aLDsW5IHLKgQqHtW-5860CKGCuTYIO..., e.g., "Baseline security practices" is 23 in the progress chart and 22 in the public comment spreadsheet
so this is confusing..
anyway i put my proposed changes in the Changes column of the spreadsheet for all recs w my name next to them.
unfortunately i cannot attend the call this week, NSF-related conflict. (yes russ this means you can delete all recommendations with my name on them! ;) )
seriously, i will try to catch up with laurin later in the week, or happy to discuss by email.
is there a working revised draft and if so can someone send the URL? i can put proposed revised text into that doc.
k
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 01:21:45PM -0400, Russ Housley wrote: Rapporteurs:
Please update this progress chart: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cOZ1lPXqHfuZNt68zvB5xRB63eBoL3gonDbh... <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1cOZ1lPXqHfuZNt68zvB5xRB63eBoL3gonDbh...>
In addition, please put together a plan to report to the full SSR2 RT on or before 1 July 2020. If a subteam is unable to report by that time, the fullt review team will discuss whether to augment the subteam or drop the recommendation.
Russ
On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
KC observed that the energy in the SSR2 RT is quite low. She suggested that a deadline be set for the Subteams to complete their work, and that a failure to meet the deadline means that the recommendation does not have adequate support from the team to remain in the report. Since about half of the team was not on the call, I want to raise this suggestion on the mail list. The team leadership will discuss this suggestion on Monday, so please provide your thoughts on the mail list by Sunday.
Russ
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.