Hi Geoff et all, Without the intention to drag this thread onwards, I want to put this on the record that I initiated the last minute meeting with SSAC on Wednesday. As stated by others, it was not intended to exclude (or include) anyone but merely my over eager attempt to find a path forward. It was initiated as a casual “can we chat” between old colleagues. I apologize if this has added to ill perceptions. … Norm
On Nov 2, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
I am sorry to sound like a broken record Denise, but calling a SSR2 meeting with ZERO notice is yet another instance of my issues with this leadership style. I would like to request some level of due notice and efforts for inclusion of all team members on the part of leadership, as without it I believe that you cannot subsequently represent any outcome as being representative in any form or fashion of the SSR2 team.
As I have already noted here, my conversations with the SSAC chairs last night indicated that there was no expectation of any subsequent communication from SSR2 so I am confused that there are different reports of outcomes from presumably the same meeting. Perhaps this is illustrative of the perils of undertaking such informal “get togethers” as becoming a source of further dysfunctionality rather than resolving them.
Geoff
On 2 Nov 2017, at 10:16 am, Denise Michel <denisemichel@fb.com> wrote:
To work on info request for some SSAC members
Denise Michel Sent via phone _______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review