Dear KC, We looked at this one first because it seemed rather uncontroversial and because I could prepare it quickly; it was also the “pilot”. Without question, some recommendations will take more time and editing. Happy to help with extra discussions, as long as I have some lead time. All the best Laurin
On 16 Dec 2018, at 11:59, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
KC:
So I'm comparing the 2 URLs below, and the only difference I see is that the new doc doesn't include the background notes used to inform the answer to the 4 questions. Am I missing something?
The first URL has a place for people to put proposed report text. It will probably be more polished than the notes that were gathered in the table, which is in the second document.
I think my assigned recs 23 and 24 need a dedicated hour of discussion to start, I will send out the text of these two in separate mail and ask anyone interested to donate a separate hour, not to take away from our weekly call.
Thanks for you initiative,
Russ
Please use this Google doc (p4 onwards) to insert draft text: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WwzmsBDEtI0uvrxqSIs7zaBZRalZkC-TwO1VE_pN... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WwzmsBDEtI0uvrxqSIs7zaBZRalZkC-TwO1VE_pN...>. Pen-holders are indicated in the doc, which is accessible to Review Team members only.
For reference, here is the document that contains the initial findings as drafted by the RT: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qUxV4L-gS5xHmC4QQPGRk81MgQuhQvsbnEU7xxe8... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qUxV4L-gS5xHmC4QQPGRk81MgQuhQvsbnEU7xxe8...>
_______________________________________________ Ssr2-review mailing list Ssr2-review@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review