I would like to note that I disagree with the recommendations about travel for multiple community members. The purpose of UASG should be to get non-compliant code changed and we should be using 95% of our resources to that goal. In the last couple of years we have become focused on promotion, branding, outreach, ambassadors, measurement, etc, which are all useful but have only an indirect impact on our goal. We are in danger of 95% of our resources going on these activities and our goal being achieved very, very slowly as a result. I would like to see travel limited to the chair and vice-chair attending only two icann meetings a year and the rest of our resources directly targeted at getting the code changed. Kind regards Jay (sent from my phone) -- Jay Daley Managing Director techobscura Limited +64 21 678840 skype: jaydaley