July 25, 2017
6:02 a.m.
From: Mark Svancarek Date: 2017-07-25 08:22 To: John C Klensin CC: Jiankang; Hollander Don; Nalini J Elkins; HEALTH Yao; Marvin Cheng; uki Ho; Harish Chowdhary; Dr. AJAY D A T A; ua-eai@icann.org; Jan Nelson; Shawn Steele; Stuart Stuple Subject: RE: HTML 5.2 and Internationalized Eamil Addresses
But I don't understand why one would resist changing a spec which is known to be "wrong" and non-RFC compliant. Is the argument that revising it to be RFC-compliant would risk destabilizing more sites than fixing it?
+1 I share the same concern with you. Jiankang Yao