Besides this statement being quite peculiar, my understanding is that we are talking about "within ICANN's mission". Please explain the "Associated Parties" bit some more. ICANN only recently stated in the Appeal going on in DC that they can NOT act on ccTLDs. The only reason why ICANN can do anything to/with ccTLD is because they control the root. greetings, el On 2015-10-07 16:01, Paul Twomey wrote: [...]
I repeat my objection to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights because of the sections which would make ICANN responsible for the Human Rights actions of its associated parties (in ICANN's case I can see this being applied to the actions of ccTLDS in authoritarian countries). [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/