On 23/02/2017 01:23, Julie Hammer wrote:
Achieving diversity in skills should not be seen as a choice between skills and diversity which excludes participation, but rather one which values many skills sets and facilitates inclusion and broad participation.
I'm not sure I understand this sentence. I was getting the impression that this groups' fundamental understanding of the term "diversity" is to exclude white people and men from consideration for certain positions, on the grounds that we've got too many of them already. I assumed this is why the diversity report omits what I would have thought was the most obvious expectation, a commitment to avoid racial or sexual discrimination. Am I mistaken? If so, why is there no such commitment? Malcolm -- Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523 Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/ London Internet Exchange Ltd Monument Place, 24 Monument Street London EC3R 8AJ Company Registered in England No. 3137929 Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA