August 2017 - Ws2-hr - lists.icann.org

Re: [Ws2-hr] new text..... Suggested Text [renamed subject line]
by Rudolph Daniel Aug. 9, 2017

Aug. 9, 2017

May I make the following observations on this latest text.... When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a mechanism ( why singular and not 'mechanisms'...if from past comments, if I comprehend,) like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. It could also consider, in appropriate cases, voluntary remediation efforts. (It could also consider, where it deems appropriate, voluntary remediation efforts (?) ) However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether to do so, and if so how (i.e., choosing the most appropriate framework, ( think u mean mechanism not framework) instrument, ( singular? or plural?) or remediation effort. (again I think you mean 'efforts') The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. .... On Aug 9, 2017 1:20 PM, "McAuley, David via Ws2-hr" <ws2-hr(a)icann.org> wrote: > > As part of the drafting team recruited yesterday during the call, I would like to suggest text to consider (BTW – I don’t think there is a separate “drafting team” email list for this discrete effort). > > BACKGROUND: > > Here is text as proposed by Niels prior to our call yesterday (the original text is in his email forwarded below): > > 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. > However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. > > I suggested a different text on list yesterday but I have tweaked it in my latest suggested text below to take account of two points Kavouss made on list. > > First, I use the word “mechanism” instead of “framework” and I add a reference to voluntary remediation, agreeing with Kavouss to attempt to address comments by several country reps to the group. > > MY LATEST SUGGESTED TEXT: > > 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a mechanism like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. It could also consider, in appropriate cases, voluntary remediation efforts. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether to do so, and if so how (i.e., choosing the most appropriate framework, instrument, or remediation effort). The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. > > Best regards, > David > > David McAuley > Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager > Verisign Inc. > 703-948-4154 > > -----Original Message----- > From: ws2-hr-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever > Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 3:55 PM > To: ws2-hr(a)icann.org > Subject: [EXTERNAL] [Ws2-hr] red line > > Hi all, > > Original text: > > When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. > > Text proposed by me on the call: > > When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. > However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. > > I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team. > > Best, > > Niels > > > -- > Niels ten Oever > Head of Digital > > Article 19 > www.article19.org > > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ > Ws2-hr mailing list > Ws2-hr(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr > _______________________________________________ > Ws2-hr mailing list > Ws2-hr(a)icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr

2 1

red line
by Niels ten Oever Aug. 9, 2017

Aug. 9, 2017

Hi all, Original text: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. Text proposed by me on the call: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team. Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

6 6

Caption notes, recordings and transcript for Human Rights Subgroup Meeting #29 | 8 August 2017
by MSSI Secretariat Aug. 9, 2017

Aug. 9, 2017

Hello all, The raw caption notes, recordings and transcripts for CCWG Accountability WS2 Human Rights Subgroup Meeting #29– 8 August 2017 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/JwIhB A copy of the action items and notes may be found below. Thank you. With kind regards, Brenda Brewer, Projects & Operations Assistant Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) [cid:image001.png@01D31099.DF934E10] Action Items: * NTO to send red-line of changes to list. * DM, GS, TT volunteer for drafting team for the two elements of text which were discussed on the call this week for consideration at the next meeting. Raw Captioning Disclaimer: This rough edit transcript, which may contain missing, misspelled or paraphrased words, is only provided for your immediate review and is not certified as verbatim and is not to be cited in any way. * Word Doc<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272103/HR%20Raw%20Draft%…> * PDF<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272103/HR%20Raw%20Draft%…> Decisions: * (none) Requests: * (none) Documents * Presentation Meeting 31<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272103/Presentation%20Me…> * Google Doc<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> : Proposed FoI-HR and Considerations for CCWG during resolving public comments

1 0

Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
by Niels ten Oever Aug. 8, 2017

Aug. 8, 2017

Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

7 10

Caption notes, recordings and transcript for Human Rights Subgroup Meeting #28 | 1 August 2017
by MSSI Secretariat Aug. 1, 2017

Aug. 1, 2017

Hello all, The raw caption notes, recordings and transcripts for CCWG Accountability WS2 Human Rights Subgroup Meeting #28– 1 August 2017 will be available here: https://community.icann.org/x/JQIhB A copy of the action items and notes may be found below. Thank you. With kind regards, Brenda Brewer, Projects & Operations Assistant Multistakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) [cid:image001.png@01D30ADC.C04F1F10] Action Items: * NTO – Circulate draft language concerning UK govt comment wrt Ruggie possibly applying to ICANN Org. vs ICANN the community. * BT – Circulate comment tracking. Notes Disclaimer: This rough edit transcript, which may contain missing, misspelled or paraphrased words, is only provided for your immediate review and is not certified as verbatim and is not to be cited in any way. * Word doc<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272101/HR%20Subgroup_Dra…> * PDF<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272101/HR%20Subgroup_Dra…> Decisions: * (none) Requests: * (none) Documents: * HumanRights-PublicConsultation-May2017-HighlightsV1.2<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/69272101/HumanRights-Publi…>

1 0