Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Thanks, Niels. I will not be able to join this evening’s (CET) call, but I note that the proposed change (3.1) is formulated so carefully that a referral to the UNGPs here becomes meaningless in my opinion. ‘Could’, ‘consider’, ‘using a framework like’. & Where did the ‘and offer remediation’ come from btw? (Fyi I do agree with suggesting in the FoI that ICANN _the organisation_ could use the UNGPs when ‘assessing its impact on Human Rights’.) Furthermore, if this is going to be added in some form in the FoI, I take it that the ‘With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting the Core Value’ part on page 6 also needs to be looked at? regards Bastiaan
On 8 Aug 2017, at 14:43, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Hi all,
I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies.
You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 <Presentation Meeting 31.pdf><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-HumanRights-Meeting-20170801-DAIRs.docx><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-HumanRights-PublicConsultation-May2017-HighlightsV1.3-BT.pdf>_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
Thanks, Bastiaan, I don't think the reference is really that meaningless as we were trying to get some consensus language that will mention Ruggie and provide a hint that ICANN the org might consider them as we probably won't reach consensus on the issue whether ICANN should commit to them (plus we don't have mandate for this). I also wonder where this "offer remediation" language came from. We haven't discuss anything like this on the call, and I will strongly object this. Again, in my opinion it's not in the mandate of this group to tell ICANN the org whether it should offer remediation and to use this language as it is (1) vague (2) therefore borders with enforcement (3) related to implementation, not interpretation. Niels, could you please tell us where the remediation is coming from as I don't recall any suggestions like that on the last call? Cheers, Tanya On 08/08/17 16:03, Bastiaan Goslings wrote:
Thanks, Niels.
I will not be able to join this evening’s (CET) call, but I note that the proposed change (3.1) is formulated so carefully that a referral to the UNGPs here becomes meaningless in my opinion. ‘Could’, ‘consider’, ‘using a framework like’. & Where did the ‘and offer remediation’ come from btw?
(Fyi I do agree with suggesting in the FoI that ICANN _the organisation_ could use the UNGPs when ‘assessing its impact on Human Rights’.)
Furthermore, if this is going to be added in some form in the FoI, I take it that the ‘With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights, no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting the Core Value’ part on page 6 also needs to be looked at?
regards Bastiaan
On 8 Aug 2017, at 14:43, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Hi all,
I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies.
You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 <Presentation Meeting 31.pdf><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-HumanRights-Meeting-20170801-DAIRs.docx><CCWG-Accountability-WS2-HumanRights-PublicConsultation-May2017-HighlightsV1.3-BT.pdf>_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
Hi Tatiana, It is in the call records, but always happy to discuss. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 06:21 PM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
I also wonder where this "offer remediation" language came from. We haven't discuss anything like this on the call, and I will strongly object this. Again, in my opinion it's not in the mandate of this group to tell ICANN the org whether it should offer remediation and to use this language as it is (1) vague (2) therefore borders with enforcement (3) related to implementation, not interpretation.
Niels, could you please tell us where the remediation is coming from as I don't recall any suggestions like that on the last call?
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Hi Niels, Thank you for these. I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in. With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well: 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation"). However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language). Best regards, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Hi David, Should it say "framework and instruments" (plural)? And are we talking about voluntary adoption by ICANN the organization of the Ruggie Principles? Is that what is meant by "using a framework like the UNGPs"? Does that mean we are saying that a PDP could result in adoption of Ruggie? Or are we saying the ICANN Board could adopt Ruggie? Not sure what this means. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D3102F.5E048C20] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:02 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi Niels, Thank you for these. I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in. With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well: 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation"). However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language). Best regards, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed
agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could
consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific
instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org>
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
The existing language in "Considerations" is pasted below. It's not clear to me where this new language just sent by Niels is intended to be inserted, but it appears there could be a conflict with the existing language below, as noted by Bastiaan. With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights , no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting the Core Value. However with regard to the implementation of the Core Value certain aspects of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights could be considered as a useful guide in the process of applying the Human Rights Core Value. There are certain Guiding Principles that may not be suitable for ICANN and others that might be applicable, depending on the circumstances. However, it is beyond the scope of this document to provide a detailed analysis of the Guiding Principles and their application, or not, in particular situations. In any case, a conflict between any Guiding Principle and an ICANN Bylaw provision or Article of Incorporation must be resolved in favor of the Bylaw or Article. The use of the Guiding Principles as potential guidance has to be carefully considered by each SO and AC as well as ICANN the organization. Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:02 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi Niels, Thank you for these. I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in. With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well: 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation"). However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language). Best regards, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed
agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could
consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific
instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org>
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Niels et al, It looks as though the language that Niels is proposing to modify as a result of some comments exists in its current form in the Considerations document as follows : EXISTING LANGUAGE – This is what I think the existing language says: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instruments to do this. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.” PROPOSED LANGUAGE WITH REDLINED CHANGES - Below I try to create a redline of the existing language – BUT PERHAPS NIELS HIMSELF HAS A REDLINE? When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its (REPLACES “their”) impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it (REPLACES “this”) is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement . TEXT WHICH APPEARS TO BE DELETED AND REPLACED IS “decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this”. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis (REPLACES “of such HRIAs”) should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. In the Considerations document, we also have language which tries to protect the role of SOs and ACs as follows: “When developing corporate or operational policies, and executing its operations, ICANN the organization should take the Human Rights Core Value into account. In order to do so ICANN the organization should propose a framework to the community, which should include multistakeholder involvement in its development, and regular review.” We know that one reason this language exists is that registries cannot be bound by anything inserted into a registry agreement that is not developed as Consensus Policy in the GNSO. So my question is whether this new language conflicts in that it states that it is up to ICANN the organization to implement a framework, not just up to ICANN as to whether it uses an HRIA tool. When we consider that this language goes well beyond “applicable law”, the risk is “top-down” policy making. Hopefully the proposed changes to the existing language will be clarified on the call. Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image002.png@01D3103A.4A635DD0] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:42 AM To: 'McAuley, David'; Niels ten Oever Cc: ws2-hr@icann.org; 'Greg Shatan' Subject: RE: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC The existing language in "Considerations" is pasted below. It's not clear to me where this new language just sent by Niels is intended to be inserted, but it appears there could be a conflict with the existing language below, as noted by Bastiaan. With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights , no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting the Core Value. However with regard to the implementation of the Core Value certain aspects of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights could be considered as a useful guide in the process of applying the Human Rights Core Value. There are certain Guiding Principles that may not be suitable for ICANN and others that might be applicable, depending on the circumstances. However, it is beyond the scope of this document to provide a detailed analysis of the Guiding Principles and their application, or not, in particular situations. In any case, a conflict between any Guiding Principle and an ICANN Bylaw provision or Article of Incorporation must be resolved in favor of the Bylaw or Article. The use of the Guiding Principles as potential guidance has to be carefully considered by each SO and AC as well as ICANN the organization. Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _______________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:02 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi Niels, Thank you for these. I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in. With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well: 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation"). However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language). Best regards, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed
agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could
consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific
instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org>
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Apologies... not be on the call. RD On Aug 8, 2017 2:35 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:
Niels et al,
It looks as though the language that Niels is proposing to modify as a result of some comments exists in its current form in the Considerations document as follows :
*EXISTING LANGUAGE – This is what I think the existing language says:*
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instruments to do this. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.”
*PROPOSED LANGUAGE WITH REDLINED CHANGES* - Below I try to create a redline of the existing language – BUT PERHAPS NIELS HIMSELF HAS A REDLINE?
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its (REPLACES “their”) impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it (REPLACES “this”) is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement . TEXT WHICH APPEARS TO BE DELETED AND REPLACED IS “decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this”. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis (REPLACES “of such HRIAs”) should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
In the Considerations document, we also have language which tries to protect the role of SOs and ACs as follows:
“When developing corporate or operational policies, and executing its operations, ICANN the organization should take the Human Rights Core Value into account. In order to do so ICANN the organization should propose a framework to the community, which should include multistakeholder involvement in its development, and regular review.”
We know that one reason this language exists is that registries cannot be bound by anything inserted into a registry agreement that is not developed as Consensus Policy in the GNSO.
So my question is whether this new language conflicts in that it states that it is up to ICANN the organization to implement a framework, not just up to ICANN as to whether it uses an HRIA tool. When we consider that this language goes well beyond “applicable law”, the risk is “top-down” policy making. Hopefully the proposed changes to the existing language will be clarified on the call.
Anne
*Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
AAikman@lrrc.com
_____________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
*From:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne *Sent:* Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:42 AM *To:* 'McAuley, David'; Niels ten Oever *Cc:* ws2-hr@icann.org; 'Greg Shatan' *Subject:* RE: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
The existing language in "Considerations" is pasted below. It's not clear to me where this new language just sent by Niels is intended to be inserted, but it appears there could be a conflict with the existing language below, as noted by Bastiaan.
With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human
Rights , no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting
the Core Value. However with regard to the implementation of the Core
Value certain aspects of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and
Human Rights could be considered as a useful guide in the process of
applying the Human Rights Core Value. There are certain Guiding
Principles that may not be suitable for ICANN and others that might be
applicable, depending on the circumstances. However, it is beyond the
scope of this document to provide a detailed analysis of the Guiding
Principles and their application, or not, in particular situations.
In any case, a conflict between any Guiding Principle and an ICANN
Bylaw provision or Article of Incorporation must be resolved in favor of
the Bylaw or Article. The use of the Guiding Principles as potential
guidance has to be carefully considered by each SO and AC as well as
ICANN the organization.
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
AAikman@lrrc.com
_______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
-----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:02 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
Hi Niels,
Thank you for these.
I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/ document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvhWhc/edit) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in.
With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well:
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation").
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language).
Best regards,
David
David McAuley
Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM
To: ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
Hi all,
I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies.
You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgi porUwqNymvhWhc/edit
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed
agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could
consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific
instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 ______________________________ _________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
Here is the redline. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:
Apologies... not be on the call. RD
On Aug 8, 2017 2:35 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:
Niels et al,
It looks as though the language that Niels is proposing to modify as a result of some comments exists in its current form in the Considerations document as follows :
*EXISTING LANGUAGE – This is what I think the existing language says:*
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instruments to do this. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.”
*PROPOSED LANGUAGE WITH REDLINED CHANGES* - Below I try to create a redline of the existing language – BUT PERHAPS NIELS HIMSELF HAS A REDLINE?
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its (REPLACES “their”) impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it (REPLACES “this”) is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement . TEXT WHICH APPEARS TO BE DELETED AND REPLACED IS “decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this”. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis (REPLACES “of such HRIAs”) should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
In the Considerations document, we also have language which tries to protect the role of SOs and ACs as follows:
“When developing corporate or operational policies, and executing its operations, ICANN the organization should take the Human Rights Core Value into account. In order to do so ICANN the organization should propose a framework to the community, which should include multistakeholder involvement in its development, and regular review.”
We know that one reason this language exists is that registries cannot be bound by anything inserted into a registry agreement that is not developed as Consensus Policy in the GNSO.
So my question is whether this new language conflicts in that it states that it is up to ICANN the organization to implement a framework, not just up to ICANN as to whether it uses an HRIA tool. When we consider that this language goes well beyond “applicable law”, the risk is “top-down” policy making. Hopefully the proposed changes to the existing language will be clarified on the call.
Anne
*Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
AAikman@lrrc.com
_____________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
*From:* Aikman-Scalese, Anne *Sent:* Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:42 AM *To:* 'McAuley, David'; Niels ten Oever *Cc:* ws2-hr@icann.org; 'Greg Shatan' *Subject:* RE: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
The existing language in "Considerations" is pasted below. It's not clear to me where this new language just sent by Niels is intended to be inserted, but it appears there could be a conflict with the existing language below, as noted by Bastiaan.
With regards to the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human
Rights , no consensus was reached as to their suitability for interpreting
the Core Value. However with regard to the implementation of the Core
Value certain aspects of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and
Human Rights could be considered as a useful guide in the process of
applying the Human Rights Core Value. There are certain Guiding
Principles that may not be suitable for ICANN and others that might be
applicable, depending on the circumstances. However, it is beyond the
scope of this document to provide a detailed analysis of the Guiding
Principles and their application, or not, in particular situations.
In any case, a conflict between any Guiding Principle and an ICANN
Bylaw provision or Article of Incorporation must be resolved in favor of
the Bylaw or Article. The use of the Guiding Principles as potential
guidance has to be carefully considered by each SO and AC as well as
ICANN the organization.
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
AAikman@lrrc.com
_______________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
-----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of McAuley, David via Ws2-hr Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 10:02 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
Hi Niels,
Thank you for these.
I looked at the latest google doc link you sent ( https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTu EqMbgiporUwqNymvhWhc/edit) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in.
With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well:
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation").
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language).
Best regards,
David
David McAuley
Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc.
703-948-4154 <(703)%20948-4154>
-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM
To: ws2-hr@icann.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC
Hi all,
I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies.
You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuE qMbgiporUwqNymvhWhc/edit
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed
agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia
Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
2. Review of last weeks changes
2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion
3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could
consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific
instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation.
However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most
appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN
the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in
ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG
5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 ______________________________ _________________
Ws2-hr mailing list
Ws2-hr@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
participants (7)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Bastiaan Goslings -
Dr. Tatiana Tropina -
Greg Shatan -
McAuley, David -
Niels ten Oever -
Rudolph Daniel