Hi all, Original text: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. Text proposed by me on the call: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team. Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
Here's a redline. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
I have some difficulty with 'could consider'......as there seems to be no intent....'should consider' , in my view ..goes some way towards a consensus, but puts the decision firmly into the hands of ICANN... Using the formation that follows...(?) rd On Aug 8, 2017 5:55 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a redline.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
Would the disagreement be solved by saying, When examining its operations, ICANN the organization should consider using tools for analysis as suggested in the UNGPs, for example Principle 18, as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate tools and instruments to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D31049.7A76A810] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 700 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Rudolph Daniel Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 1:17 PM To: Greg Shatan Cc: <ws2-hr@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] red line I have some difficulty with 'could consider'......as there seems to be no intent....'should consider' , in my view ..goes some way towards a consensus, but puts the decision firmly into the hands of ICANN... Using the formation that follows...(?) rd On Aug 8, 2017 5:55 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com<mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com>> wrote: Here's a redline. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net<mailto:lists@nielstenoever.net>> wrote: Hi all, Original text: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. Text proposed by me on the call: When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team. Best, Niels -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org<http://www.article19.org> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org<mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Cleaner ... certainly and specific reference to principle 18..... UNGP s including Principle 18 ....as well as.... (??) rd On Aug 8, 2017 6:23 PM, "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:
Would the disagreement be solved by saying,
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization should consider using tools for analysis as suggested in the UNGPs, for example Principle 18, as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate tools and instruments to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
*Anne E. Aikman-Scalese*
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 <(520)%20629-4428> office
520.879.4725 <(520)%20879-4725> fax
AAikman@lrrc.com
_____________________________
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
*From:* ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Rudolph Daniel *Sent:* Tuesday, August 08, 2017 1:17 PM *To:* Greg Shatan *Cc:* <ws2-hr@icann.org> *Subject:* Re: [Ws2-hr] red line
I have some difficulty with 'could consider'......as there seems to be no intent....'should consider' , in my view ..goes some way towards a consensus, but puts the decision firmly into the hands of ICANN... Using the formation that follows...(?) rd
On Aug 8, 2017 5:55 PM, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Here's a redline.
On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Niels ten Oever <lists@nielstenoever.net> wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Happy to rejoin the drafting team to move this forward. Matthew On 08/08/2017 20:54, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
-- Matthew Shears matthew@intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears
Dear All, I have noted two textes , one proposed by Ann for which I suggested to replace " TOOL" by " Mechanism" OR " Arrangement" The other by Greg on which I have no comment Regards Kavouss On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Matthew Shears <matthew@intpolicy.com> wrote:
Happy to rejoin the drafting team to move this forward.
Matthew
On 08/08/2017 20:54, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
--
Matthew Shears matthew@intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
participants (6)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Greg Shatan -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Matthew Shears -
Niels ten Oever -
Rudolph Daniel