Hi Niels, Thank you for these. I looked at the latest google doc link you sent (https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh...) and did not see the proposed language of 3.1 in there and so am assuming you want to pass it by on the list first – and I see others have weighed in. With respect, I would suggest a few edits to 3.1 as proposed – I think I am fairly in line with Tatiana’s thoughts but can also explain on the call as well: 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights. (STRIKING "and offer remediation"). However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide whether and how (i.e., the most appropriate framework and instrument) to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. (ADDING the "whether and how" language). Best regards, David David McAuley Sr International Policy & Business Development Manager Verisign Inc. 703-948-4154 -----Original Message----- From: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2017 8:44 AM To: ws2-hr@icann.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Ws2-hr] Proposed agenda meeting 31 - August 8 19:00 UTC Hi all, I am very sorry, I made a mistake in the text I shared under 3.1 with you before. Please use this version and please accept my apologies. You can also find the whole text as always in the Google doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/17AvMLBfT8BmC3gUOTvaIuTuEqMbgiporUwqNymvh... Dear all, I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath: 1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes 3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting. 4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB Looking forward to discuss on the call. Best, Niels On 08/08/2017 02:22 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you all very well. Please find the proposed agenda for the meeting of August 8, 19:00 UTC underneath:
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Review of last weeks changes 2.1 addition ‘, but not limited to:’ to two footnotes
3. Proposed change as follow-up to last weeks discussion 3.1 When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
4. Preparation of statement to CCWG 5. AOB
Looking forward to discuss on the call.
Best,
Niels
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
-- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9