Dear All, I have noted two textes , one proposed by Ann for which I suggested to replace " TOOL" by " Mechanism" OR " Arrangement" The other by Greg on which I have no comment Regards Kavouss On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Matthew Shears <matthew@intpolicy.com> wrote:
Happy to rejoin the drafting team to move this forward.
Matthew
On 08/08/2017 20:54, Niels ten Oever wrote:
Hi all,
Original text:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could also consider instruments such as HRIAs to assess their impact on Human Rights. However, this is up to ICANN the organization to develop and implement. The results of such HRIAs should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
Text proposed by me on the call:
When examining its operations, ICANN the organization could consider using a framework like the UNGPs as well as specific instruments such as HRIAs to assess its impact on Human Rights, and offer remediation. However, it is up to ICANN the organization to decide the most appropriate framework and instrument to do this. The results of ICANN the organization's analysis should be reflected in ICANN’s annual reporting.
I am greatly looking forward to the suggestion of the drafting team.
Best,
Niels
--
Matthew Shears matthew@intpolicy.com +447712472987 Skype:mshears
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr