Thanks Kavouss. I am adding your amendments to the google doc. I think other members of the drafting team won't mind. I actually agree with your point, especially since I gathered from listening to the last call there was a general agreement that the Board is the final determination. So the same text as we have for the GAC advise should be in the other section. I think we might just put this paragraph somewhere up in that section to make the flow of the text better, but right now I put in on the place you proposed in the word document. Warm regards, Tatiana. On 21/02/17 13:47, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
Dear All, In view of what I said in previous message, The following should are the amendments that I suggest. See Attachment Regards Kavouss
2017-02-21 13:29 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com>>:
Dear Niels, At our last meeting , ANN and someone else tried to treat GAC and two other SOs namely GNSO and ccNSO in regard with respecting Human Rights quite differently to which I objected. The two supporting organizations provide re3commendations to ICANN Board based on their respective PDP developed. GAC provide Advice to the Board based on Public Policy issues . The treatment of these output by ICANN Board must be equal. In other words if they are examined against respecting, all three should undergo that criteria if not none of them. Consequently the text in the document must have equal weighting and equal status. I also do not understand one GAC member indicating GAC Advice should respect Human Rights, which I have problem on that, but that GAC member did not say that GNSO and ccNSO policies must also respect Human Rights. The unequal treatment that was mentioned by that GAC member is inappropriate Regards Kavouss
2017-02-21 9:12 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch <mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>>:
Please accept my apologies. Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC is for the time being not feasible for me due to other commitments.
Kind regards
Jorge
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr-bounces@icann.org>] Im Auftrag von Niels ten Oever Gesendet: Montag, 20. Februar 2017 21:37 An: ws2-hr <ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr@icann.org>> Betreff: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda February 21 19:00 UTC
Dear all,
I hope this email finds you well. Please find underneath and attached the proposed agenda.
1. Administrivia Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc 2. Discussion of work-in-progress considerations document by drafting team 3. AOB
Please find also attached the current version of the work-in-progress considerations document, which at this moment is a rough sketch for discussion in the drafting group.
It can also be found here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZ... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZ...>
I'm greatly looking forward to talk to you all tomorrow.
Best,
Niels
--
Niels ten Oever Head of Digital
Article 19 www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
PGP fingerprint 2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488 643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr>
_______________________________________________ Ws2-hr mailing list Ws2-hr@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr