October 2016 - Ws2-jurisdiction

Agenda
by Greg Shatan Oct. 6, 2016

Oct. 6, 2016

All, Here is the agenda, which was left off my earlier email. Greg

5 5

Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction - Google Doc
by Greg Shatan Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

All, As promised on today's call, I have created a Google Doc version of the slide discussed on today's call. Please add your comments and suggestions to the Google Doc. The link is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yT… Please let me know if you have any issues accessing the document. Greg

2 2

Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction
by Jean-Jacques Subrenat (via Google Docs) Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

I've shared an item with you: Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oE9xDIAJhr4Nx7vNO_mWotSXuUtTgJMRs6U92yT… It's not an attachment – it's stored online. To open this item, just click the link above. Greg & All, during our call today my audio connection was poor, so I'm sending in writing the "additional jurisdictions" layout I tried to convey orally. Jean-Jacques.

1 0

Agenda for Meeting #6; Multiple Layers of Jurisdictions
by Greg Shatan Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

All, Here is the agenda for the upcoming meeting of the Jurisdiction Subgroup at 13:00 UTC Wednesday, October 5, 2016, as well as a slide on the "Multiple Layers of Jurisdiction." I look forward to our meeting. Greg

3 2

Fwd: [bylaws-coord] Draft ICANN Bylaws Draft of April 20, 2016: CCWG=Accountability and CWG-Stewardship Certifications
by Greg Shatan Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

All, In connection with our discussion of the Gap Analysis in Work Stream 1, the email below should be helpful in our work. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Gregory, Holly <holly.gregory(a)sidley.com> Date: Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:29 PM Subject: [bylaws-coord] Draft ICANN Bylaws Draft of April 20, 2016: CCWG=Accountability and CWG-Stewardship Certifications To: "leonfelipe(a)sanchez.mx" <leonfelipe(a)sanchez.mx>, Mathieu Weill < mathieu.weill(a)afnic.fr>, "thomas(a)rickert.net" <thomas(a)rickert.net>, " bylaws-coord(a)icann.org" <bylaws-coord(a)icann.org>, "jrobinson(a)afilias.info" < jrobinson(a)afilias.info>, Lise Fuhr <Fuhr(a)etno.eu>, "cwg-client(a)icann.org" < cwg-client(a)icann.org> Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg(a)sidley.com>, "ICANN(a)adlercolvin.com" <ICANN(a)adlercolvin.com>, "accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org" < accountability-cross-community(a)icann.org>, "Flanagan, Sharon" < sflanagan(a)sidley.com>, "ccwg-accountability5(a)icann.org" < ccwg-accountability5(a)icann.org> *CCWG Accountability* April 20, 2016 Dear CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, Members, Participants and Staff, We have reviewed the Proposed Draft ICANN Bylaws, dated April 20, 2016 (“Proposed Draft Bylaws”), a copy of which is attached. We believe that the Proposed Draft Bylaws are consistent with the Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability (“CCWG-Accountability”) Supplemental Final Proposal on Work Stream 1 Recommendations (23 February 2016) relating to the IANA Stewardship Transition. Accordingly, we recommend that the Proposed Draft Bylaws be posted to the community for review. Kind regards, Holly J. Gregory and Rosemary E. Fei Sidley Austin LLP and Adler & Colvin *CWG-Stewardship* April 20, 2016 Dear CWG Co-Chairs, Members, Participants and Staff, We have reviewed the Proposed Draft ICANN Bylaws, dated April 20, 2016 (“Proposed Draft Bylaws”), a copy of which is attached. We believe that the Proposed Draft Bylaws are consistent with the Cross Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions (“CWG-Stewardship”) Final Proposal (11 June 2015) relating to the IANA Stewardship Transition. Accordingly, we recommend that the Proposed Draft Bylaws be posted to the community for review. Kind regards, Holly J. Gregory and Sharon R. Flanagan Sidley Austin LLP *HOLLY* *J. GREGORY* Partner and Co-Chair Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group *Sidley Austin LLP* 787 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10019 +1 212 839 5853 holly.gregory(a)sidley.com www.sidley.com *[image: SIDLEY]* ************************************************************ **************************************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately. ************************************************************ **************************************** _______________________________________________ bylaws-coord mailing list bylaws-coord(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/bylaws-coord

1 0

Milton Mueller on the transition going through
by Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch Oct. 4, 2016

Oct. 4, 2016

Dear all I thought this piece from Milton was worth sharing: http://www.internetgovernance.org/2016/09/28/its-over-yestoiana/ What he mentions as "exhibit A" is possibly a possibility that may have not lapsed entirely with the transition and could pop-up in different jurisdictions. Perhaps something worth considering... Regards Jorge

2 1

The Gap Analysis: Question, Method and Objective -- Proposal for Comment
by Greg Shatan Oct. 1, 2016

Oct. 1, 2016

All, Based on the call today, I'm presenting the following as the proposed path forward on the Gap Analysis: 1. *The Question*. Whether each of the accountability measures proposed in Work Stream 1 can be implemented under ICANN's current jurisdictional framework without any gaps. (Implementation "without any gaps" means the ability to apply an accountability measure to, and ultimately enforce that measure against, ICANN.) 2. *The Objective*. The first objective is to determine whether there are any "gaps," i.e., whether any of the WS1 accountability measures cannot be fully implemented under ICANN's current jurisdictional framework. After possible gaps are identified, the subgroup will examine each possible gap to determine if it is in fact a gap. A list of identified gaps will be prepared. (After the gap analysis is completed, the subgroup will then explore possible ways to "close the gap" for each applicable accountability measure, i.e., to implement the measure effectively.) 3. *The Method*. The Final Proposal of WS1 will be posted as a Google Doc. Subgroup members are asked to assign themselves one chapter of the Proposal to review for "gaps." Notes on potential "gaps" can be made directly on the Google Doc proposal as comments. A separate sign-up sheet will be posted, also as a Google Doc. Subgroup members that cannot access Google Drive can put their chosen "assignments" into an email, and can also provide their analysis via email as well. Subgroup rapporteurs and staff will make the necessary notations. Comments are requested and appreciated. However, in order to keep up the momentum, the Final Proposal and sign-up sheet will be posted on Tuesday, September 27. Our question, objective and method can be further refined even as we move forward. I look forward to your comments and to seeing the assignments and analyses in the coming days and weeks. Best regards, Greg

8 8