All, The questions have been further revised in response to recent suggestions. This is now in a Google Doc at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HslgBieiTl2LNT1CXNct7ZS1Qi5lZy3r8Y42CVzf... <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HslgBieiTl2LNT1CXNct7ZS1Qi5lZy3r8Y42CVzf...> . Word and PDF versions are attached as well. I hope that we can complete these questions on Thursday's call (19:00 UTC). Please review and provide comments. Thanks! Greg *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> wrote:
Tijani,
That's a good point and something we have been meaning to confirm. I will add a question on that subject.
Greg
*Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428> S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428> gregshatanipc@gmail.com
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 2:07 AM, Tijani BEN JEMAA < tijani.benjemaa@topnet.tn> wrote:
Greg and Mathieu,
I noticed that among the questions, there is nothing about the jurisdiction of contracts between ICANN and another party who is not based in one of the locations that you mentioned (registry based in France for example). Can you add a question about that?
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- *Tijani BEN JEMAA* Executive Director Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*) Phone: +216 98 330 114 <+216%2098%20330%20114> +216 52 385 114 <+216%2052%20385%20114> ------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------
Le 21 févr. 2017 à 17:55, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> a écrit :
Thanks Greg,
I expect that ICANN legal might ask us some clarifying questions about the question, but it would be good to engage in this dialogue.
As a demonstration that we also did our homework on the issue, it might be worth noting that the ICANN litigation documents ( https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/litigation-en) web page mentions : - Several cases of litigations in US States out of California - One case of litigation outside of the US only (the Pool.com <http://pool.com/> case (https://www.icann.org/resourc es/pages/governance/litigation-enwhich never lead to a formal court order, but within which ICANN seems to have argued against the choice of jurisdiction. I should also note that ICANN’s arguments were related to the specific circumstances of the case, and not necessarily applicable to other potential cases)
Best Mathieu
*De :* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounc es@icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org>] *De la part de* Greg Shatan *Envoyé :* mardi 21 février 2017 04:58 *À :* ws2-jurisdiction *Objet :* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Revised Questions for ICANN Legal
All,
Here is a revised version of the questions for ICANN legal, with the previous changes accepted and new changes based on our last call shown in track changes.
Please reply if you have any questions or comments, or if you believe these are now ready to forward to the CCWG's legal committee.
Thanks!
Greg
*Greg Shatan*C: 917-816-6428 <(917)%20816-6428> S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 <(646)%20845-9428> gregshatanipc@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction