Dear all Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“ contribution I note that it is not fully accurate. For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was not readily determined”…) – Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”, and a request to check the translation again. Kind regards Jorge Von: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Bernard Turcotte Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29 An: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org) <acct-staff@icann.org> Betreff: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses All, As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF. The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?) If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)". This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email. Please advise if you have any questions. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2