[Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
All, As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF. The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?) If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)". This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email. Please advise if you have any questions. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
Thank you, Bernie!! *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:29 PM, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com
wrote:
All,
As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF.
The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?)
If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)".
This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Dear all Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“ contribution I note that it is not fully accurate. For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was not readily determined”…) – Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”, and a request to check the translation again. Kind regards Jorge Von: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Bernard Turcotte Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29 An: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org) <acct-staff@icann.org> Betreff: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses All, As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF. The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?) If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)". This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email. Please advise if you have any questions. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
Jorge, Thank you for this. We have asked for a review of the translations. B. On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:11 AM, <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
Dear all
Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“ contribution I note that it is not fully accurate.
For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was not readily determined”…) –
Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”, and a request to check the translation again.
Kind regards
Jorge
*Von:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction- bounces@icann.org] *Im Auftrag von *Bernard Turcotte *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29 *An:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff ( acct-staff@icann.org) <acct-staff@icann.org> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2- Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
All,
As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF.
The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?)
If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)".
This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Bernard Turcotte
ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
Dear all In addition to the former: the summary does not reflect the answer from the “.swiss” registry – in particular the answer to Q1 is (apart from the translation issues) not summarized but cut off after the initial general paras – leaving out the substance of the answer which deals with specific jurisdictional issues. Hence, please complete the summary, especially on Q1 and disregard this first summary at least as what “.swiss” is concerned. Thanks and regards Jorge Von: Cancio Jorge BAKOM Gesendet: Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 16:11 An: 'Bernard Turcotte' <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>; ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org) <acct-staff@icann.org> Betreff: AW: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses Dear all Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“ contribution I note that it is not fully accurate. For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was not readily determined”…) – Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”, and a request to check the translation again. Kind regards Jorge Von: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org<mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Bernard Turcotte Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29 An: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org<mailto:ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org<mailto:acct-staff@icann.org>) <acct-staff@icann.org<mailto:acct-staff@icann.org>> Betreff: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses All, As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF. The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?) If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)". This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email. Please advise if you have any questions. Bernard Turcotte ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
For purposes of review and evaluation of the individual responses in our upcoming meetings, it probably makes sense to go to the individual text of each response, rather than the "review tool." Greg *Greg Shatan *C: 917-816-6428 S: gsshatan Phone-to-Skype: 646-845-9428 gregshatanipc@gmail.com On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 10:17 AM, <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> wrote:
Dear all
In addition to the former: the summary does not reflect the answer from the “.swiss” registry – in particular the answer to Q1 is (apart from the translation issues) not summarized but cut off after the initial general paras – leaving out the substance of the answer which deals with specific jurisdictional issues.
Hence, please complete the summary, especially on Q1 and disregard this first summary at least as what “.swiss” is concerned.
Thanks and regards
Jorge
*Von:* Cancio Jorge BAKOM *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2017 16:11 *An:* 'Bernard Turcotte' <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com>; ws2-jurisdiction < ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff (acct-staff@icann.org) < acct-staff@icann.org> *Betreff:* AW: [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2- Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
Dear all
Although I have not the time to revise the translation of the „.swiss“ contribution I note that it is not fully accurate.
For instance, the response to question 1 is more nuanced (its French original says amongst other things, that “it was not evident” for the Swiss Government to determine itself to enter into a contract – not that it “was not readily determined”…) –
Hence, a word of caution, a reminder that only the original is “official”, and a request to check the translation again.
Kind regards
Jorge
*Von:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction- bounces@icann.org <ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org>] *Im Auftrag von *Bernard Turcotte *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017 22:29 *An:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org>; ACCT-Staff ( acct-staff@icann.org) <acct-staff@icann.org> *Betreff:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] CCWG-Accountability-WS2- Jurisdiction-Questionnaire-SummaryofResponses
All,
As requested at the meeting today please find attached the staff summary of the responses to the jurisdiction questionnaire in both Excel and PDF.
The format should be fairly simple to understand except for the second column which is a staff suggestion as to IF the response should be analyzed (Yes, No, ?)
If a response was overly long for this format a part of it is included as well as the mention "(long response - see submission)".
This summary now includes the three translated replies which are also attached to this email.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Bernard Turcotte
ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability WS2
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
participants (3)
-
Bernard Turcotte -
Greg Shatan -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch