Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
All, The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work. Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr" <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net> Bernie, Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions. Greg
Greg One very tiny “nit” – I assume that the word “jurisdiction” in question four should also have the asterisk that the other three questions have, since we mean the same thing, right? Paul Paul Rosenzweig <mailto:paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com O: +1 (202) 547-0660 M: +1 (202) 329-9650 VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/> www.redbranchconsulting.com My PGP Key: <https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684 From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:38 PM To: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> Subject: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary All, The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work. Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line. Greg ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc@gmail.com> > Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com <mailto:turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> > Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr <mailto:Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr> " <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr <mailto:Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr> >, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx <mailto:leonfelipe@sanchez.mx> >, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net <mailto:thomas@rickert.net> > Bernie, Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions. Greg
Yes, that's true. I'll send corrected copies around. Thanks, Paul. I was working to get this out in a timely fashion. "Fast, Cheap, Good. Pick any two" is even more true when you're working for free. On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Paul Rosenzweig < paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
Greg
One very tiny “nit” – I assume that the word “jurisdiction” in question four should also have the asterisk that the other three questions have, since we mean the same thing, right?
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <(202)%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <(202)%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <(202)%20738-1739>
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search= 0x9A830097CA066684
*From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction- bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:38 PM *To:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> *Subject:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
All,
The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work.
Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Greg Shatan* <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr" <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net>
Bernie,
Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Greg
Greg, YES A lot of efforts were made in this regard. I will make an statement in the plenary .To this effect IO will also propose that sufficient commenting period be agreed to allow the répondants to search, collect and assemble documentation hope those who unprecedently were mobilized to push for their views as finally and reluctantly now agreed would not object to that suggestion. I also agree with Paul to add Astérix against " Jurisdiction " in Q4 Kavouss 2017-01-10 22:43 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Yes, that's true. I'll send corrected copies around. Thanks, Paul. I was working to get this out in a timely fashion. "Fast, Cheap, Good. Pick any two" is even more true when you're working for free.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig@ redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
Greg
One very tiny “nit” – I assume that the word “jurisdiction” in question four should also have the asterisk that the other three questions have, since we mean the same thing, right?
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <(202)%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <(202)%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <(202)%20738-1739>
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830 097CA066684
*From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounc es@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:38 PM *To:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> *Subject:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
All,
The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work.
Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Greg Shatan* <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr" <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@rickert.net
Bernie,
Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
Copies are attached with the asterisk appended to Question 4(a). Greg On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com> wrote:
Greg, YES A lot of efforts were made in this regard. I will make an statement in the plenary .To this effect IO will also propose that sufficient commenting period be agreed to allow the répondants to search, collect and assemble documentation hope those who unprecedently were mobilized to push for their views as finally and reluctantly now agreed would not object to that suggestion. I also agree with Paul to add Astérix against " Jurisdiction " in Q4 Kavouss
2017-01-10 22:43 GMT+01:00 Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc@gmail.com>:
Yes, that's true. I'll send corrected copies around. Thanks, Paul. I was working to get this out in a timely fashion. "Fast, Cheap, Good. Pick any two" is even more true when you're working for free.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Paul Rosenzweig < paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com> wrote:
Greg
One very tiny “nit” – I assume that the word “jurisdiction” in question four should also have the asterisk that the other three questions have, since we mean the same thing, right?
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
paul.rosenzweig@redbranchconsulting.com
O: +1 (202) 547-0660 <(202)%20547-0660>
M: +1 (202) 329-9650 <(202)%20329-9650>
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739 <(202)%20738-1739>
www.redbranchconsulting.com
My PGP Key: https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830 097CA066684
*From:* ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org [mailto: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Greg Shatan *Sent:* Tuesday, January 10, 2017 3:38 PM *To:* ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org> *Subject:* [Ws2-jurisdiction] Fwd: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary
All,
The email below with clean and marked versions of the revised Questionnaire was sent to staff for distribution to the Plenary. Congratulations to the Subgroup for coming to consensus on question 4, which allowed us to complete our revisions to the draft Questionnaire and bring it back to the CCWG-Plenary tomorrow. Soon, we will be able to release our questionnaire and look forward to receiving responses to help inform the subgroup as we continue our work.
Thank you for the spirit of compromise that ultimately allowed us to cross the finish line.
Greg
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Greg Shatan* <gregshatanipc@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:06 PM Subject: Jurisdiction Subgroup Questionnaire for CCWG-Plenary To: Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard@gmail.com> Cc: "Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr" <Mathieu.Weill@afnic.fr>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@sanchez.mx>, Thomas Rickert < thomas@rickert.net>
Bernie,
Attached are clean and "track changes" versions of the Questionnaire, showing changes to the prior version of the Questionnaire. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Greg
_______________________________________________ Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list Ws2-jurisdiction@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
participants (3)
-
Greg Shatan -
Kavouss Arasteh -
Paul Rosenzweig