Hi, An additional thought on this. On 09-Aug-16 11:05, avri doria wrote:
I have one concern about our group. Looking at the Participant & Observer lists I do not see many staff members participating. I think it important that there be some staff members in this group, including some who are not part of legal staff or of senior management. I think talking about staff accountability without staff representation may be problematic. Of course there would need to provisions allowing for them to participate freely without worry that what they say may adversely affect their job prospects. I do not know if this concern is reasonable and whether others in the group share the concern. So I would be interested is seeing some comments on this topic.
I have started a section in the drive doc on this issue. As people can comment anonymously if they wish (by logging out of their gmail account before typing) I would welcome any comments staff members might have on this topic. I would also be happy to receive private email from which I would extract anonymized comments. And I would of course be thrilled to see staff comments that are attributable if that is possible in the current climate among ICANN staff. avri --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus