Hi Shin, The RIPE NCC will attend DCDF2025, and I am invited to participate in several sessions and workshops. Indeed, this event presents the platform for discussions on WSIS+20 and digital cooperation among Arab countries. I can say that the Arab States’ position aligns with Saudi Arabia’s, which has positively contributed to the open consultation process. BR//Chafic On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 15:12, Shin Yamasaki via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Does anyone going to attend or watch remotely the UN ESCWA – Digital Cooperation and Development Forum (DCDF2025) held in Anman, Jordan which is stated as "relevant event" at DESA's page?
https://publicadministration.desa.un.org/wsis20/relevant%20events
Especially the following sub-forum: The fourth Arab High-Level Forum on WSIS and 2030 Agenda; February 24 to 26, 2025.
Although no details have been announced, I imagine that place could be a field to discuss WSIS+20 as well as digital cooperation among the Arab countries including Saudi Arabia.
https://dcdf-2025.unescwa.org/index.html https://indico.un.org/event/1013523/
Kind regards, Shin Yamasaki
From: Wolfgang Kleinwächter via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> Subject: [wsis20] Re: RCC Pushes for State-Led Internet Governance Ahead of WSIS+20 Review Date: 2025/2/7 21:57:12
@ Saudi Arabia: We should also recognize the DCO, initiated by SA, with a strong woman Deemah AlYahya as Secretary General. https://dco.org/governance/ w
Chafic Chaya via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> hat am 07.02.2025 13:41 CET geschrieben:
Dear Colleagues,
Thank you all for your contributions to this discussion. It is evident from our exchanges that we are witnessing a significant shift in the Internet governance landscape, particularly with Saudi Arabia.
I would like to emphasise that a key driver behind this change has been the sustained engagement and capacity-building efforts led by the technical community, including RIPE NCC, ICANN and ISOC. In recent years, when topics such as “Internet Governance” or “multistakeholderism” were often sidelined, RIPE NCC has been working closely with the Saudi Arabia and has seen tangible progress through collaborative initiatives.
These include signing a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Saudi regulator, which has paved the way for a more open and productive dialogue; organising RIPE NCC government roundtable that foster direct engagement between the Arab governments and the technical community; playing an integral role in the Saudi National IPv6 Task Force, which has helped position Saudi Arabia as the 5th globally in IPv6 adoption; organising MENOG in Riyadh, a vital platform for regional dialogue and knowledge-sharing that further solidifies multistakeholder engagement across the Middle East, North Africa, and Gulf regions. Additionally, we co- organised the first-ever joint session between the Saudi government and the technical community (RIPE NCC) at IGF2024 in Riyadh setting a new standard for inclusive dialogue.
Furthermore, a coordination meeting has been agreed upon between the Saudi regulator and the technical community ahead of WSIS+20. This meeting will offer an excellent opportunity to share the technical community position and support Saudi efforts for greater multistakeholder engagement.
I believe the lessons learned from our work with Saudi Arabia and with other Arab countries, such as the United Arab Emirates, can serve as a blueprint for engaging stakeholders in other regions.
Best regards,
Chafic Chaya
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 at 00:19, Ashton-Hart, Nick via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Judith, I’m quite certain what happened on gender wasn’t horse trading. Not in the least.
But we digress from the purposes of this list I think.
*Nick Ashton-Hart* *APCO*** (m) +1 202 779 1072 <tel:+12027791072>
Book time to meet with me here <https://outlook.office.com/ bookwithme/user/ ce911a0f9fa543dd9459b3a1392da25e@apcoworldwide.com? anonymous&isanonymous=true>
On 2/6/25, 3:12 PM, "Judith Hellerstein via wsis20" <wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org>> wrote:
HI Nick,
What happened in Plenipot was just horse trading. If you are speaking about connectivity and the ITRs, but I get your point. I do think that Saudi Arabia has changed its tone and now supports the multi stakeholder approach or how they interpret it. Yes, I was in Riyadh and yes it was successful because the Saudis realized that if they want to take a lead in AI and other areas they need to change their ways. They need to garner support in different areas. Also do note, in some countries the ITU representatives are often very different than the IGF reps.
I also think that the Saudi Government officials with their guests and others who came to the conference in Riyadh and experienced what true multi Stakeholder is had their eyes opened and better understand it. They might also understand what path they might want to take. So yes I think it helped immensely that the IGF was in Riyadh.
Saudi Arabia also will host within 10 years the World Cup and others whom I spoke to there indicated that within a few years the total ban against alcohol will also have to disappear. They can read the writing on the walls and want to make sure they are not left out.
They are also very active in other institutions and working to change the culture and the way of life as they see this must happen for them to be successful.
Just my two cents
Best,
Judith
Sent from my iPad
judith@jhellerstein.com <mailto:judith@jhellerstein.com>
Skype ID:JudithHellerstein
On Feb 6, 2025, at 2:56 PM, Ashton-Hart, Nick via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org>> wrote:
Speaking personally, when it comes to Saudi Arabia (and other states in that region as well as others), I will believe there is real change happening when I see a change of positions on policy at key conferences like the ITU’s agenda-setting meetings. Speeches are important, many policy directions are signalled in speeches, but in the end what matters is what positions states take on key issues in negotiations themselves.
Any of you who were at Plenipot in Romania on the final days in particular knows exactly what I’m talking about.
*Nick Ashton-Hart* *APCO*** (m) +1 202 779 1072 <tel:+12027791072>
Book time to meet with me here <https:// outlook.office.com/bookwithme/user/ ce911a0f9fa543dd9459b3a1392da25e@apcoworldwide.com? anonymous&isanonymous=true>
On 2/6/25, 1:43 PM, "Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond via wsis20" <wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org>> wrote:
Dear Fiona,
it's the difference between having old school decision makers who have no idea what they are speaking about and new stakeholders selected for their intelligence and knowledge of the topics.
The world is changing.
Abdullah Alswaha is one of these new leaders. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Alswaha <https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Alswaha>
His speech at IGF was inspirational. https://youtu.be/wGxF6BVp-AM?si=GHQRxtOQn-LYJ7VQ <https:// youtu.be/wGxF6BVp-AM?si=GHQRxtOQn-LYJ7VQ>
A friend of mine worked with him at CISCO and he was already an inspiring boss.
So the message we are sending out is one thing, but there also needs to be an intelligent ear at the other end of the fibre.
Kindest regards,
Olivier
On 06/02/2025 18:27, Fiona Alexander via wsis20 wrote:
Hi to all
Interesting discussion and thread. And while the actions recommended to make sure that the facts get out there and various negotiators are armed with them seem wise, I personally was more struck by a different contribution to the same meeting. That of Saudi Arabia. I've attached for ease of finding.
The RCC, presumably lead by Russia, contribution seems in my experience to be largely consistent with where Russia and that region has been on this set of issues for the larger part of the past 20 years. So really no surprise.
The Saudi contribution is a different story to my eye. A clear written statement of their support for multistakeholder approaches. I don't recall ever seeing this position from them at the ITU before. In fact, they were firmly against it, at least in all the negotiations I participated in during my time in government.
Would be curious to hear from others their thoughts on how we got to this. I believe there has been quite a sustained effort by the Internet technical community in this region and perhaps there are some lessons for all us on how we can actually demonstrate the utility of multistakeholder approaches to those that still are skeptical. Also could explain their effort and work to host last year's IGF.
Fiona
*From:* Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> <mailto:wsis20@icann.org> *Sent:* Thursday, February 6, 2025 5:08 AM *To:* wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org> <wsis20@icann.org> <mailto:wsis20@icann.org> *Subject:* [wsis20] Re: RCC Pushes for State-Led Internet Governance Ahead of WSIS+20 Review
*External Email:* Use caution with links and attachments.
Dear all,
Thank you for the thoughtful and engaging discussion around my recent article on CircleID regarding the RCC’s push for a state-led Internet governance mode <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://circleid.com/ posts/rcc-pushes-for-state-led-internet-governance- ahead-of-wsis20-review__;!!IaT_gp1N! 2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP- ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-4Ftvk28$>l. The diverse perspectives shared here highlight the significance of this issue and the need for continued vigilance in safeguarding the multistakeholder model.
Addressing Key Points Raised:
1. *Armenia’s Alignment with RCC – Shifting Alliances?*
* @Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, your observation on Armenia’s stance is indeed intriguing, considering its usual alignment with Western digital policies. However, recent geopolitical tensions and regional dependencies may have influenced this decision. Whether Armenia stands to lose or gain from this move will depend on how other global actors respond.
2. *Hidden Agendas and Misleading Framing of Internet Governance*
* @Wolfgang Kleinwächter, your detailed analysis of Section 3 of the RCC proposal is crucial. While the call for an equitable, neutral, and geopolitically immune governance system is commendable, the assertion that the multistakeholder model fails to meet these requirements is misleading. ICANN’s structure, particularly through the GAC, already embodies sovereign equality and neutrality. The example of ICANN’s refusal to remove Russian domain names during the Ukraine conflict underscores its resilience against political pressures. Moving towards state-controlled governance would, paradoxically, introduce more geopolitical interference rather than eliminate it.
3. *Misuse of the “Public Core” Concept*
* @Joseph Lorenzo Hall and @Tatiana Tropina, your point on the RCC’s misrepresentation of the “public core” concept is well taken. The original GCSC definition was carefully crafted through a multistakeholder process to protect essential Internet infrastructure, whereas the RCC’s broader framing risks enabling greater state intervention. As you rightly pointed out, conflating the “public core” with “critical resources” could open the door to increased governmental control over fundamental Internet operations, which would be detrimental to the open and decentralized nature of the Internet.
4. *The RCC Proposal’s Conflict with WSIS Principles*
* @Dr. Jimson Olufuye, you highlight a fundamental flaw in the RCC proposal—it contradicts the very foundations of WSIS, the Tunis Agenda, and the Global Digital Compact (GDC), all of which emphasize multistakeholder engagement. While the proposal may be “dead on arrival” in some forums, it still serves as a strategic tool for certain governments to justify expanding their control over the Internet. This is why continued advocacy and engagement remain necessary.
5. *Diplomatic Engagement and Advocacy Strategy*
* @Nick Ashton-Hart, @Israel Rosas, and @Remmy Nweke, I fully agree that diplomatic engagement is critical at this juncture. Many diplomats dealing with WSIS+20 and broader digital governance discussions may not have a deep understanding of the multistakeholder model’s nuances. The RCC narrative, if left unchallenged, could appeal to those who prioritize state sovereignty over openness. Strengthening outreach efforts, capacity- building initiatives, and direct engagement with policymakers will be essential to countering this influence.
6. *Potential ITU Involvement in IP Addressing and Protocol Governance*
* @Nick Ashton-Hart, your point about the potential push to shift IP protocol governance to the ITU is an alarming but not surprising development. Given past efforts to exert greater governmental control over core Internet functions, vigilance is needed to ensure that governance remains within the multistakeholder ecosystem, where technical bodies like the IETF and RIRs maintain their crucial roles.
7. *The Issue of Undefined Stakeholder Roles*
* @Mark W. Datysgeld and @Alejandro Pisanty, the issue of fluid stakeholder identities is a valid concern. While the multistakeholder model is designed to be inclusive and adaptable, the lack of clear stakeholder categorization has been exploited by certain actors to challenge its legitimacy. As Alejandro notes, the original WSIS definitions were already a compromise, and while we have made progress in differentiating stakeholder roles, ambiguity remains. Addressing this issue transparently in WSIS+20 discussions could help prevent its use as a pretext for government overreach.
8. *Potential Impact on Network Neutrality and Platform Regulation*
* @Alejandro Pisanty, your warning about threats to network neutrality and regulations like Section 230 is well-founded. If these principles are eroded in democratic contexts, it will provide authoritarian governments with further justification to impose stricter controls on online content and access. Ensuring that digital governance remains rights-based and independent of political agendas must be a key focus moving forward.
The Road Ahead
The RCC’s proposal is not just a theoretical debate—it is part of a broader geopolitical effort to shift Internet governance towards a more state-controlled model. While it may not succeed in its current form, the underlying ideas will likely persist, making it crucial for the Internet governance community to remain proactive.
As many of you pointed out, we must:
* Continue engaging with diplomats and policymakers who may not be fully aware of the implications of state-led governance. * Strengthen capacity-building efforts to educate stakeholders on the benefits of multistakeholder governance. * Push back against misrepresentations of concepts like the “public core” to prevent them from being used as pretexts for increased governmental control. * Reinforce the neutrality and resilience of existing governance structures, particularly within ICANN and technical organizations. * Monitor and counteract attempts to shift key Internet governance functions to intergovernmental bodies like the ITU.
I appreciate all your insights and contributions to this discussion. Let’s continue this dialogue and work collectively to uphold the principles of an open, secure, and inclusive Internet.
Cheers, *Pari Esfandiari*
On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 2:28 AM Alejandro Pisanty <apisanty@gmail.com <mailto:apisanty@gmail.com>> wrote:
Mark,
good point re the definition of stakeholders. You may know that I was in the WGIG (as a few others in this list.) WGIG was the Working Group on Internet Governance created by the first phase of WSIS in 2003, charged with producing a report with a definition of Internet Governance and some proposals to move forward, for the second phase in 2005. The definition of stakeholder groupings was a major issue then and we settled into government, business ("private sector" has different meanings in the US and elsewhere), civil society and the technical community. Unfortunately we couldn't get the final documents to list the technical community as a separate stakeholder, not the least because at the same time it was recognized that the people in the technical community may have their jobs indistinctly in government (say, research laboratories, computing, IT and telecommunications departments in government, standards organizations, even universities if they are public), industry both large and small, and organizations classified as civil society (their techies among others.) Later on the IGF in practice has always listed the technical community separately. The differentiated presence of the technical community is indispensable and it cuts two ways - sometimes it has to say "no,, that thing you are imagining is not technically possible, or it is unreasonable, or it breaks the Internet" and sometimes it says to other parties "we can actually do better than you are thinking and maybe already are" - and sometimes, very often rather, we have to tell people, especiallly in governments, "no, it doesn' work that way" and enter long explanations.
Now picking on the second part of your statement: with fuzzy borders, we can say that one thing is the definition of the stakeholder groupings, as above, and another, complementary one, is the assignment of specific individuals to stakeholder groups at a given point in time. Also especially in developing countries we do continue to find that a small number of people fulfill many roles at the same time and thus can be simultaneously ascribed to more than one stakeholder group. Someone working in business (or even owining one) may come to Internet governance with that knowledge but acting through an organization like an NGO oriented to education or development or community networks, and or sit on an advisory committee to a telecoms or competition regulator. We have made progress in the last 20 years towards clearer roles and against conflicts of interest but this fluidity remains and also is very valuable.
We should convey this clearly to the skeptics and also know that it is a facetious argument invoked with ill intent while fully knowing the above.
Yours,
Alejandro Pisanty
On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 7:53 PM Mark W. Datysgeld via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org <mailto:wsis20@icann.org>> wrote:
One idea presented by the document that cannot just be waved away is that "stakeholder roles remain undefined". They do. I understand Pari's relevant answer to that point, but it does not address the fact that stakeholder identity is incredibly liquid. Take any set of IGF applications and you are likely to quickly find the same speaker submitted as 3 different stakeholders in different applications.
This is a subject that cannot be put aside in the upcoming discussion and the High-Level Event itself, because it is a weakness of our multistakeholder models that can and will be used against us by governments in their bid for increased control.
Regards,
On 5 Feb 2025 07:03, Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 wrote:
This review of the RCC’s submission in the lead-up to the WSIS+20 examines its call for a state-led approach to Internet governance and its implications for the multistakeholder model. It explores how the RCC frames its arguments around digital sovereignty, interoperability, and regulatory frameworks while assessing the potential impact on global Internet governance structures, innovation, and access. Additionally, the article considers the broader geopolitical context of the submission and its alignment—or divergence—with international efforts to maintain an open, inclusive, and secure digital environment.
https://circleid.com/posts/rcc-pushes-for- state-led-internet-governance-ahead-of- wsis20-review <https://urldefense.com/v3/ __https://circleid.com/posts/rcc-pushes- for-state-led-internet-governance-ahead- of-wsis20-review__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-4Ftvk28$>
Cheers,
Pari
--
Pari Esfandiari
President
*/Global TechnoPolitics Forum <https:// urldefense.com/v3/__http:// www.technopolitics.org__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-NbZKWFk$> /*
*/Pario <https://urldefense.com/v3/ __http://www.parioconsultants.com__;!! IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-xP8p8ow$>- Architects of Ideas/*
info@TechnoPolitics.org <mailto:info@technopolitics.org>
*Linkedin Profile <https://urldefense.com/ v3/__https://www.linkedin.com/in/ pariesfandiari/__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-Bt4JaUE$>*
Tel: +1-202_-__735-1415_ (Office)
: +1-310-435-0888 (Cell)
: +44-731-210-4049 (Cell)
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network
and review relevant resources:https://go.icann.org/wsis20 < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://go.icann.org/wsis20__;!!IaT_gp1N!2b7n92T...
Read the public archives for this mailing list:
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/__;!!IaT_g...
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent
to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!IaT_gp1...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!IaT_gp1N!2...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Mark W. Datysgeld Director at Governance Primer [governanceprimer.com <https://urldefense.com/ v3/__https://governanceprimer.com__;!! IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-jWVFiuA$>]
Project Lead Developer at ICANNWiki [icannwiki.org <https://urldefense.com/v3/ __https://icannwiki.org/__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-hziaYGI$>]
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https:// go.icann.org/wsis20 <https://urldefense.com/ v3/__https://go.icann.org/wsis20__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-tFT7mAc$>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:// mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-l8hd-Ms$>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:// www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-EbZ1zAw$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos < https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!IaT_gp1N!2...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dr. Alejandro Pisanty Facultad de Química UNAM Av. Universidad 3000, 04510 Mexico DF Mexico +525541444475 Blog: http://pisanty.blogspot.com <https:// urldefense.com/v3/__http:// pisanty.blogspot.com__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-7emGT4Q$>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:// www.linkedin.com/in/pisanty__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-jFf6zyY$>
Unete al grupo UNAM en LinkedIn, http:// www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614 <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:// www.linkedin.com/e/gis/22285/4A106C0C8614__;!! IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-BIyjtRw$>
Twitter: http://twitter.com/apisanty <https:// urldefense.com/v3/__http://twitter.com/ apisanty__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-uTkh9bc$>
---->> Unete a ISOC Mexico, http://www.isoc.org <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:// www.isoc.org__;!!IaT_gp1N!
2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP-ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-d4fST6k$>
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
--
Pari Esfandiari
President
*/Global TechnoPolitics Forum <https://urldefense.com/ v3/__http://www.technopolitics.org__;!!IaT_gp1N! 2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP- ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-NbZKWFk$> /*
*/Pario <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:// www.parioconsultants.com__;!!IaT_gp1N! 2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP- ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-xP8p8ow$>- Architects of Ideas/*
info@TechnoPolitics.org <mailto:info@technopolitics.org>
*Linkedin Profile <https://urldefense.com/v3/ __https://www.linkedin.com/in/pariesfandiari/__;!! IaT_gp1N! 2b7n92Tb_yRE7JjkNFqCKq_G5ZqVLVbNmLJ6VlRnw4kkZip0aAaP- ZS48c88lDYHYcnXUmi-Bt4JaUE$>*
Tel: +1-202_-__735-1415_ (Office)
: +1-310-435-0888 (Cell)
: +44-731-210-4049 (Cell)
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review
relevant resources:https://go.icann.org/wsis20 < https://go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list:
https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ < https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the
processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy ( https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos < https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
DATA HANDLING
For data handling questions, please view our Privacy Policy <https://apcoworldwide.com/privacy-policy/> or contact us at privacy@apcoworldwide.com <https:// %20privacy@apcoworldwide.com/> with any inquiries.
CONFIDENTIALITY
This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20 <https:// go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https:// mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ <https://mm.icann.org/ pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest- style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20 <https:// go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https:// mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ <https://mm.icann.org/ pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy <https://www.icann.org/ privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https:// www.icann.org/privacy/tos <https://www.icann.org/privacy/ tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20 Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/ tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.