Hello distinguished Prof. Emeritus Wolfgang, Thank you very much for your response. If you can recall at the CSTD Working Group on IGF Improvement in 2011-2012 time-frame, funding was a major discussion point and it was from that brainstomring that the IGF Support Association (IGFSA) was conceived. Yes, it would have been nice to have an established and predictive funding stream for the IGF but I think the fuel for its survival so far has been its relevance as we see Saudi Arabia and many once opposed to IGF welcoming it. I believe when we get to the position of universal consensus on this, it'd happen. In the meantime, stakeholders should continue to contribute to the funding of the Secretariat. ICANN, the BC, Google, RIRs, etc have been supportive in this regard through IGFSA and they should not relent. Nevertheless, I think the output and outcome of IGF viz its capacity development opportunities, summary documents, repositories and the proliferation of NRIs are excellent pointers to its growing strength. Cheers... JO On 2024-10-09 21:22, Wolfgang Kleinwächter wrote:
Hi Jimson,
as we disucussed ten years ago in the UNCSTD WG on IGF Improvement, the best option for a finanically strong IGF is a diversified system, where all stakeholders contribute to the budget. This would guarantee a certain level of independence.
The problem is, as we have seen in the last years, if all contributions are "voluntary", the risk is high, that the "real budget" is too small to survive but too big to die. And this reduces the impact of the IGF into global policy making in the digital environment.
There should be some regulations how big governments as well as VLOPs (Very Large Online Platforms) has to contribute with substantial sums to the IGF budget.
wolfgang
Dr Jimson Olufuye <jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng> hat am 04.10.2024 21:12 CEST geschrieben:
Thanks Wolf for your lucid and informative article!
Question for you: The IGF Secretariat is being funded and nations hosting the yearly event have been responsible for the in-country expenses. Is it only when the UN budgets officially for the IGF in it budget cycle that IGF can be considered to be strengthened?
In the meantime, here is my article on the Summit of the Future: https://circleid.com/posts/the-summit-of-the-future-a-hope-for-the-future
Cheers,
JO -------------------------------- Jimson Olufuye PhD (fncs, ficma, c.ITP, PRINCE2, CISA, CISM, CRISC, PhD) Chairman, Advisory Council, AfICTA.africa Chairman, Kontemporary® Konsulting Ltd
On 2024-09-25 13:00, Wolfgang Kleinwächter via wsis20 wrote:
Thx. Pari,
good conclusions. Linking SDGs to WSIS Actions lines should become a key issue in WSIS+20. We should argue for "Digital Development Goals" (DDGs) or "Comprehensive Development Goals" (CDGs) beyond 2030.
Here is my GDC comment: https://circleid.com/posts/un-cyber-diplomacy-poc
w
Pari Esfandiari via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> hat am 24.09.2024 20:15 CEST geschrieben:
Here is my Review of the Summit of the Future: The “Pact for the Future”: A Bold Vision for Global Cooperation with Lingering Doubts on SDGs Progress [1]
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 5:36 PM Veni Markovski via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Hi, everyone! You can download the full text here:
sotf-the-pact-for-the-future PDF Document · 695 KB
Best regards, Veni
__ _______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
--
Pari Esfandiari President _Global TechnoPolitics Forum [2] _ _Pario [3]- Architects of Ideas_
info@TechnoPolitics.org
Linkedin Profile [4]
Tel: +1-202-735-1415 (Office) : +1-310-435-0888 (Cell) : +44-731-210-4049 (Cell) _______________________________________________ Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20 Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/ _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Links: ------ [1] https://circleid.com/posts/summit-of-the-future-pact-for-the-future [2] http://www.technopolitics.org [3] http://www.parioconsultants.com [4] https://www.linkedin.com/in/pariesfandiari/ _______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.