Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB) Reflections on the WSIS+20 Elements Paper
Dear All, I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB). It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document. Best, Jen on behalf of the IMSB
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort! Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to *"engagement at the sub-national level*" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.) I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.) Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process; Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB _______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Ann, Thanks for the feedback. For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate independently of the country within which they're recognised? Thanks. Jimson Member of the IMSB On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort!
Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.)
I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.)
Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne
FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks Jimson. Yes, there are some limitations, but the basic principle is as explained in the text below from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Thus, their "nationhood status" cannot be said to be "sub-national" in the U.S. We realize this may not be the case in other countries. I'm sure the UN's Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples has a great deal more information. Though I represented federally-registered tribes in the US for over ten years when still practicing law, I am not an expert. We would of course need to recruit indigenous representatives to participate and we are working on that. (For clarity, I retired from the practice of law in 2023 and have no financial interest behind my comments.) "What is the legal status of American Indian and Alaska Native tribes? "Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution vests Congress, and by extension the Executive and Judicial branches of our government, with the authority to engage in relations with the tribes, thereby firmly placing tribes within the constitutional fabric of our nation. When the governmental authority of tribes was first challenged in the 1830's, U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall articulated the fundamental principle that has guidPed the evolution of federal Indian law to the present: *That tribes possess a nationhood status and retain inherent powers of self-government." (emphasis added)* Please advise if you have any ideas for inclusion moving forward as I know you are on the IMSB! (congrats!) Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:16 AM Jimson Olufuye, PhD. < jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng> wrote:
Hi Ann,
Thanks for the feedback.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate independently of the country within which they're recognised?
Thanks.
Jimson
Member of the IMSB
On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort!
Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.)
I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.)
Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne
FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Jimson, Thank you for your interest. For anyone else on IMSB or this list interested in one view of AI from an indigenous standpoint, please see the attached article from the current issue of Arizona Attorney magazine. Comments are primarily from the Navajo (a/ka/ Dine - pronounced dee-nay) and Hopi experiences. Anne Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:33 PM Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jimson. Yes, there are some limitations, but the basic principle is as explained in the text below from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Thus, their "nationhood status" cannot be said to be "sub-national" in the U.S. We realize this may not be the case in other countries. I'm sure the UN's Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples has a great deal more information.
Though I represented federally-registered tribes in the US for over ten years when still practicing law, I am not an expert. We would of course need to recruit indigenous representatives to participate and we are working on that. (For clarity, I retired from the practice of law in 2023 and have no financial interest behind my comments.) "What is the legal status of American Indian and Alaska Native tribes?
"Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution vests Congress, and by extension the Executive and Judicial branches of our government, with the authority to engage in relations with the tribes, thereby firmly placing tribes within the constitutional fabric of our nation. When the governmental authority of tribes was first challenged in the 1830's, U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall articulated the fundamental principle that has guidPed the evolution of federal Indian law to the present: *That tribes possess a nationhood status and retain inherent powers of self-government." (emphasis added)*
Please advise if you have any ideas for inclusion moving forward as I know you are on the IMSB! (congrats!) Anne
Anne Aikman-Scalese GNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:16 AM Jimson Olufuye, PhD. < jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng> wrote:
Hi Ann,
Thanks for the feedback.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate independently of the country within which they're recognised?
Thanks.
Jimson
Member of the IMSB
On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort!
Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.)
I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.)
Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne
FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Thanks, Anne. The attachment is quite informative. As you know, the issue of addressing AI's use of copyrighted or Intellectual Property materials is still under discussion. Perhaps the ongoing CSTD WG on Data Governance may address it. But one thing is clear, there can be no data sovereignty without a sovereign law guiding the use of your citizens' data. Whether your sacred data should be available to AI is a decision with futuristic implications. If it is not available, the risk of its misrepresentation is there, and it may be too late to act later. These issues require that all who are concerned should work together to plan with visionary foresight. Cheers, JO On 2025-08-05 01:52, Anne ICANN wrote:
Hi Jimson, Thank you for your interest. For anyone else on IMSB or this list interested in one view of AI from an indigenous standpoint, please see the attached article from the current issue of Arizona Attorney magazine. Comments are primarily from the Navajo (a/ka/ Dine - pronounced dee-nay) and Hopi experiences.
Anne
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:33 PM Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jimson. Yes, there are some limitations, but the basic principle is as explained in the text below from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Thus, their "nationhood status" cannot be said to be "sub-national" in the U.S. We realize this may not be the case in other countries. I'm sure the UN's Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples has a great deal more information.
Though I represented federally-registered tribes in the US for over ten years when still practicing law, I am not an expert. We would of course need to recruit indigenous representatives to participate and we are working on that. (For clarity, I retired from the practice of law in 2023 and have no financial interest behind my comments.)
"WHAT IS THE LEGAL STATUS OF AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE TRIBES?
"Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution vests Congress, and by extension the Executive and Judicial branches of our government, with the authority to engage in relations with the tribes, thereby firmly placing tribes within the constitutional fabric of our nation. When the governmental authority of tribes was first challenged in the 1830's, U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall articulated the fundamental principle that has guidPed the evolution of federal Indian law to the present: _That tribes possess a nationhood status and retain inherent powers of self-government." (emphasis added)_
Please advise if you have any ideas for inclusion moving forward as I know you are on the IMSB! (congrats!)Anne
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:16 AM Jimson Olufuye, PhD. <jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng> wrote:
Hi Ann,
Thanks for the feedback.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate independently of the country within which they're recognised?
Thanks.
Jimson
Member of the IMSB
On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort!
Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.)
I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.)
Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne
FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
As one of the members of the data governance working group there’s no doubt in my mind that we will be discussing these subjects. My hope is that the WSIS review will avoid data governance subjects and leave it to the working group to do its work and provide an interim report to UNGA 81 as ordered by the GDC. Nick Ashton-Hart APCO (m) +<tel:+971%2055%209548671>1 202 779 1072 nashtonhart@apcoworldwide.com From: Jimson Olufuye, PhD. via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 at 5:55 PM To: Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> Cc: wsis20@icann.org <wsis20@icann.org>, wg-strategy@intgovforum.org <wg-strategy@intgovforum.org>, Anthony, Susan <Susan.Anthony@uspto.gov> Subject: [wsis20] Re: Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB) Reflections on the WSIS+20 Elements Paper Thanks, Anne. The attachment is quite informative. As you know, the issue of addressing AI's use of copyrighted or Intellectual Property materials is still under discussion. Perhaps the ongoing CSTD WG on Data Governance may address it. But one thing is clear, there can be no data sovereignty without a sovereign law guiding the use of your citizens' data. Whether your sacred data should be available to AI is a decision with futuristic implications. If it is not available, the risk of its misrepresentation is there, and it may be too late to act later. These issues require that all who are concerned should work together to plan with visionary foresight. Cheers, JO On 2025-08-05 01:52, Anne ICANN wrote:
Hi Jimson, Thank you for your interest. For anyone else on IMSB or this list interested in one view of AI from an indigenous standpoint, please see the attached article from the current issue of Arizona Attorney magazine. Comments are primarily from the Navajo (a/ka/ Dine - pronounced dee-nay) and Hopi experiences.
Anne
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 1:33 PM Anne ICANN <anneicanngnso@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks Jimson. Yes, there are some limitations, but the basic principle is as explained in the text below from the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Thus, their "nationhood status" cannot be said to be "sub-national" in the U.S. We realize this may not be the case in other countries. I'm sure the UN's Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples has a great deal more information.
Though I represented federally-registered tribes in the US for over ten years when still practicing law, I am not an expert. We would of course need to recruit indigenous representatives to participate and we are working on that. (For clarity, I retired from the practice of law in 2023 and have no financial interest behind my comments.)
"WHAT IS THE LEGAL STATUS OF AMERICAN INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE TRIBES?
"Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution vests Congress, and by extension the Executive and Judicial branches of our government, with the authority to engage in relations with the tribes, thereby firmly placing tribes within the constitutional fabric of our nation. When the governmental authority of tribes was first challenged in the 1830's, U. S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall articulated the fundamental principle that has guidPed the evolution of federal Indian law to the present: _That tribes possess a nationhood status and retain inherent powers of self-government." (emphasis added)_
Please advise if you have any ideas for inclusion moving forward as I know you are on the IMSB! (congrats!)Anne
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 11:16 AM Jimson Olufuye, PhD. <jolufuye@kontemporary.net.ng> wrote:
Hi Ann,
Thanks for the feedback.
For clarity, do you mean, for example, that the indigenous people make decisions for their defence, foreign affairs, and currency, among others? Does the sovereignty recognition imply that they operate independently of the country within which they're recognised?
Thanks.
Jimson
Member of the IMSB
On 2025-07-28 03:22, Anne ICANN via wsis20 wrote:
Thanks, Jen, to you and the IMSB, for circulating this prior to the July 29 session. This is quite comprehensive. We appreciate all the effort!
Just one note with respect to Item 4 of the document in relation to "engagement at the sub-national level" which mentions indigenous communities. In the U.S. at least, numerous Indigenous Peoples cannot be characterized as "sub-national" or "local" in nature. They are recognized by our Supreme Court opinions and the Bureau of Indian Affairs as self-governing sovereign nations. (I understand the UN may take a different, more generalized approach.)
I have provided written comment to the Co-Facilitators on the Elements Paper regarding the need to prioritize full participation by Indigenous Peoples in the WSIS+20 process as set forth in the UN Resolution on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Paragraph 46 (pasted below again for convenience.)
Thanks again to the IMSB for all the hard work. Looking forward to the session on Tuesday! Anne
FROM THE UN RESOLUTION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES: 46. Recalls the report of the Secretary-General on enhancing the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them and recalls with appreciation the work led by the Presidents of the General Assembly at its seventieth to seventy-fifth sessions in conducting consultations with Member States, Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world and existing mechanisms of the United Nations on possible measures to enable the participation of Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions in meetings of relevant United Nations bodies on issues affecting them, which led to the adoption of Assembly resolution 71/321, taking into account the achievements in that regard of other bodies and organizations throughout the United Nations system, to be preceded by consultations with Indigenous Peoples’ representatives and institutions from all regions of the world as an input to the intergovernmental process;
Anne Aikman-ScaleseGNSO Councilor NomCom Non-Voting 2022-2026 anneicanngnso@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 4:12 PM jen--- via wsis20 <wsis20@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
I am pleased to share this submission by the Informal Multistakeholder Sounding Board (IMSB).
It is intended to highlight what we have understood to be the priorities, issues, concerns, and suggestions of a broad range of non-governmental stakeholders in discussions and publications over the past months. It is not intended to be comprehensive, nor does it attempt to reconcile conflicting points where we have felt that those positions merit further consideration. Nor is it intended to replace respective stakeholder submissions on the Elements Paper, and we take this opportunity to recognize the many thoughtful, multistakeholder discussions that have taken place in recent months. We have endeavoured in this submission to highlight concrete proposals and ideas to facilitate the next step of the WSIS+20 review process, namely the development of a Zero Draft of the UNGA WSIS+20 Outcome Document.
Best,
Jen on behalf of the IMSB_______________________________________________
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20<https://go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20<https://go.icann.org/wsis20>
Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/>
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Learn more about the WSIS+20 Outreach Network and review relevant resources: https://go.icann.org/wsis20<https://go.icann.org/wsis20> Read the public archives for this mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/<https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wsis20/> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. ________________________________ DATA HANDLING For data handling questions, please view our Privacy Policy<https://apcoworldwide.com/privacy-policy/> or contact us at privacy@apcoworldwide.com<https://%20privacy@apcoworldwide.com/> with any inquiries. CONFIDENTIALITY This email may contain material that is confidential, privileged and/or work product for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, reliance or distribution by others or forwarding without express permission is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
participants (4)
-
Anne ICANN -
Ashton-Hart, Nick -
jen＠dot.asia -
Jimson Olufuye, PhD.