I agree with Dr. Tropina on the incorrect HR language in the summary. It will lead to confusion that ICANN is signing up to adhere to some protocols and that has never been part of the plan of this group. That confusion will cause much larger problems in the future. Let's fix that language as she suggests. Thanks, Robin On Nov 10, 2015, at 5:54 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina wrote:
Hello I already made a comment on the chat during CCWG call today, making it here again. I think the human rights language in the summary is a bit confusing. "Reinforcing Adherence to Human Rights Protocols" (pages 7, 8, 31) is not exactly what WP4 proposed. The word "protocols" makes no sense in this context, it will be good either for diplomatic language or for IETF, but not for the CCWG document. As far as I am concerned, we are not suggesting to commit to any "protocols", furthermore, we even decided not to suggest to mention any instruments. Even within the context of international human rights law mentioning "protocols" doesn't make any sense. I believe just "human rights" or "internationally recognised human rights" would be much better wording. But not "protocols" because it is confusing. Best regards Tanya
On 09/11/15 22:42, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
All,
Please find attached the first full draft of the executive summary which will be discussed on the call tomorrow.
Apologies for the delay in getting this out but people have been working almost around the clock.
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support
for the co-chairs.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community