Dear Mathieu Thanks for reply As I mentioned two things are absolutely necessary to be discussed at today,s meeting 1 working method 2 Approach by which the draft prepared Irrespective of lawyers certificate WE , the CCWG who wrote the text are the sole eligible entity to Verify the draft PARAGRAPH BY PARAGRAPH WE ARE RESPONSIBLE TO CERTIFY ABD NOT PAID LAWYERS WHOM I FO NOT KNOW. Read carefully the testimony which is the origin of this doubt Regards Kavousd Sent from my iPhone
On 7 Apr 2016, at 08:26, Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill@afnic.fr> wrote:
Dear Kavouss,
As a reminder, we have agreed that this detailed verification will be undertaken by our lawyers, once we have answered their questions. The legal team will then provide us with a certification that the Bylaws address each of the Recommendation. We are not there yet, but getting closer.
Best Mathieu
De : Kavouss Arasteh [mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 6 avril 2016 23:37 À : Mathieu Weill; Thomas Rickert; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía; Thomas.Schneider@bakom.admin.ch; gac@gac.icann.org; <gac-leadership@icann.org> Cc : MSSI Secretariat; CCWG-Accountability Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Proposed agenda for CCWG ACCT Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting | Thursday, 7 April 2016 @ 12:00 UTC
Dear Co -Chair, We need to establish a working method on how to verify the Draft Bylaws to ensure their consistencies with the corresponding Recommendations from legal and accuracy point of view$ The only way would be a paragraph by paragraph verification Regards Kavouss
2016-04-06 17:46 GMT+02:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji@gmail.com>: Dear Co-Chairs,
On item 2 of the Agenda, you'd indicate during the call yesterday (it was also reflected in the notes) that responses to some of the questions and rationale will be provided.
I strongly suggest that these responses be provided in the next few hours (since we have exceeded a 24hrs window). It will be good that we have those drafts so some of us who may not attend (or may be audio only) can comment appropriately.
I am saying all these because it's been a practice in the past that decisions are made on second reading...
Regards Sent from my LG G4 Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 6 Apr 2016 1:34 p.m., "MSSI Secretariat" <mssi-secretariat@icann.org> wrote: <image001.gif> Dear All, In preparation for your call CCWG Accountability Review of Draft Bylaws Meeting – Thursday, 7 April at 12:00 – 14:00 (time converter), see below a proposed agenda: Proposed Agenda: 1. Opening Remarks 2. Second reading of question responses agreed on previous call 3. Resolution of remaining questions * 4. Next Steps 5. ICANN 56 - Helsinki 6. AOB
* SAVE THE DATE, if needed, to complete Review of Bylaws: Saturday, 9 April @ 04:00 (AM)UTC
Timeline reminder: 13 April – members of CCWG, CWG, Bylaws Coordination Group, Board and ICG to complete review of these DRAFT BYLAWS and provide feedback to legal teams
Documents for call: See wiki page here
Adobe Connect: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/accountability/
Thank you! Kind regards, Brenda
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community