Dear Greg and all, I agree the implications are worth considering in developing/improving review mechanisms and stress testing them. One issue that worries us is the potential negative repercussions of overruling the bylaws that are relied upon and expected to be upheld and enforced. Best regards Alice
Jacob,
Thank you for bringing this up. Some very independent thinking from the Independent Review Panel.... Overruling the Bylaws! Who knew that was even possible?
Greg
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Jacob Malthouse <jacob@bigroom.ca <mailto:jacob@bigroom.ca>> wrote:
Dear All,
Head's up that there are some significant recent IRP updates on the .africa case showing substantial differences of view on how the process should be conducted:
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/dca-v-icann-2013-12-11-en
The implications may be worth considering in how the RfR/IRP process is developed and stress-tested, notably in regard to witness statements and in-person hearings.
Best regards,
Jacob.
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community