Hi Thomas Just wondering about this statement in the paper: /The requirements were grouped into two categories:/ // /-//Enabling community empowerment over Board decisions with limited, strictly enumerated, last resort powers;/ // /-//Enhancing review and redress processes. / Does this adequately capture the extent of the mind-map and the items we had listed, particularly those that were identified as WS1? Not sure but thought I would ask. Thanks. Matthew On 1/22/2015 1:43 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, we apologize for the short notice, but if you could raise objections before 17.00 UTC today, that would be most appreciated. As discussed in Frankfurt, want to make sure the community gets first handed information about the outcome of our meeting and not speculations or biased information from third party.
Kind regards, Thomas
-- thomas-rickert.tel
Am 22.01.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>>:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community