COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt - 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today - Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice
I object against this short notice. Some of us have to work for a living. el On 2015-01-22 15:07, Alice Jansen wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
I also object to the short notice and believe we need just a little more time. It is more important to get it right than worry about rumors spreading when the meeting was open to anyone in the world to join in the first place and is publicly archived. How far can such inaccurate rumors spread given the transparency and openness of the meeting? The more important value given this situation is to take a day or so to get it right and allow for adequate opportunity for participants to review and comment on the draft. Thanks, Robin On Jan 22, 2015, at 5:27 AM, Dr Eberhard Lisse wrote:
I object against this short notice.
Some of us have to work for a living.
el
On 2015-01-22 15:07, Alice Jansen wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/ _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
And, while I am at it, please provide it in an Open Format. el -- Sent from Dr Lisse's iPhone 5c
On Jan 22, 2015, at 15:07, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Thanks for the share Alice, two quick comments below: - Was there really any time we had 40 unique remote participants in the AC room? (i hope you recall that members present also joined the room) - It may be helpful to reference documents mentioned in the statement, like the stress test list, the mindmap et all On a lighter note, i suggest you give at least a 24hrs window before closing comments on this doc Regards On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Seun Ojedeji,Federal University Oye-Ekitiweb: http://www.fuoye.edu.ng <http://www.fuoye.edu.ng> Mobile: +2348035233535**alt email: <http://goog_1872880453>seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng <seun.ojedeji@fuoye.edu.ng>* The key to understanding is humility - my view !
All, we apologize for the short notice, but if you could raise objections before 17.00 UTC today, that would be most appreciated. As discussed in Frankfurt, want to make sure the community gets first handed information about the outcome of our meeting and not speculations or biased information from third party. Kind regards, Thomas -- thomas-rickert.tel
Am 22.01.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org>:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Hi Thomas Just wondering about this statement in the paper: /The requirements were grouped into two categories:/ // /-//Enabling community empowerment over Board decisions with limited, strictly enumerated, last resort powers;/ // /-//Enhancing review and redress processes. / Does this adequately capture the extent of the mind-map and the items we had listed, particularly those that were identified as WS1? Not sure but thought I would ask. Thanks. Matthew On 1/22/2015 1:43 PM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, we apologize for the short notice, but if you could raise objections before 17.00 UTC today, that would be most appreciated. As discussed in Frankfurt, want to make sure the community gets first handed information about the outcome of our meeting and not speculations or biased information from third party.
Kind regards, Thomas
-- thomas-rickert.tel
Am 22.01.2015 um 14:07 schrieb Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org <mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>>:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
I have no objections at this point in time :-)-O el On 2015-01-22 15:43 , Thomas Rickert wrote:
All, we apologize for the short notice, but if you could raise objections before 17.00 UTC today, that would be most appreciated. As discussed in Frankfurt, want to make sure the community gets first handed information about the outcome of our meeting and not speculations or biased information from third party.
Kind regards, Thomas
-- thomas-rickert.tel [...]
-- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 \ / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
Dear Co-Chairs, Colleagues, Firstly, I would like to thank you all for a constructive and productive meeting and for the positive spirit, in which it was held. Secondly, thank you for circulating the Draft Statement so quickly. I have a few comments to the Draft Statement (see also attached doc.): · Page 1, 2nd par.: In the absence of yet having a formal agreement on the different (revised) documents, I propose to change "(... ),including agreement on" to "(...),including initial agreement on" (which is already used in the Draft Statement on page 2, 3rd para. · Propose to include time/date for the scheduled sessions in Singapore. · Link to/attachment of all referenced and revised documents mentioned in the Draft Statement. Best regards, Julia Julia Katja Wolman GAC representative DANISH BUSINESS AUTHORITY Dahlerups Pakhus Langelinie Allé 17 DK-2100 København Ø Telephone: +45 3529 1000 Direct: +45 35291308 E-mail: jukacz@erst.dk www.erhvervsstyrelsen.dk MINISTRY FOR BUSINESS AND GROWTH P Please consider the environment before printing this email. Fra: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] På vegne af Alice Jansen Sendt: 22. januar 2015 14:08 Til: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Emne: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt - 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today - Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice
My compliments, quite good in my opinion Cheers, Roelof Meijer From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: donderdag 22 januari 2015 14:07 To: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice
Agreed, nothing objectionable in the statement. As others have suggested, please confirm attendance (in person and remote) figures. Thank you, J. ____________ James Bladel GoDaddy On Jan 22, 2015, at 09:13, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl<mailto:Roelof.Meijer@sidn.nl>> wrote: My compliments, quite good in my opinion Cheers, Roelof Meijer From: Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> Date: donderdag 22 januari 2015 14:07 To: "accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt - 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today - Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Thanks Alice. I think the statement looks good. I would ask the Co-Chairs for only one small (but meaningful) edit in the following sentence. Remove the word "perceived." I think it's now widely accepted that the backstop role is real. If that change is problematic for anyone, then add "real or" so it becomes "real or perceived backstop." Regardless, it's more than only perceived and I think that needs to be made explicit. The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role. Thanks, Keith From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:08 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt - 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today - Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice
I agree with Keith on this point and see another related problem with the text (which I am only seeing now for the 1st time after the long journey home). The document states that scope of our work is in seeing that ICANN "remains accountable" - but that is not really true. The reason this group was formed is because the community felt ICANN was inadequately accountable today. That is a big difference in scope. So we such just say "ICANN is accountable" because there isn't agreement that ICANN currently is accountable as the current text implies by using the word "remains" in the first sentence. Thank you, Robin On Jan 22, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
Thanks Alice.
I think the statement looks good.
I would ask the Co-Chairs for only one small (but meaningful) edit in the following sentence. Remove the word “perceived.” I think it’s now widely accepted that the backstop role is real. If that change is problematic for anyone, then add “real or” so it becomes “real or perceived backstop.” Regardless, it’s more than only perceived and I think that needs to be made explicit.
The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role.
Thanks, Keith
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:08 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
+1 to Keith and Robin’s comments From: Robin Gross <robin@ipjustice.org<mailto:robin@ipjustice.org>> Date: Thursday, January 22, 2015 at 3:17 PM To: Keith Drazek <kdrazek@verisign.com<mailto:kdrazek@verisign.com>>, "accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Community" <accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting I agree with Keith on this point and see another related problem with the text (which I am only seeing now for the 1st time after the long journey home). The document states that scope of our work is in seeing that ICANN "remains accountable" - but that is not really true. The reason this group was formed is because the community felt ICANN was inadequately accountable today. That is a big difference in scope. So we such just say "ICANN is accountable" because there isn't agreement that ICANN currently is accountable as the current text implies by using the word "remains" in the first sentence. Thank you, Robin On Jan 22, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote: Thanks Alice. I think the statement looks good. I would ask the Co-Chairs for only one small (but meaningful) edit in the following sentence. Remove the word “perceived.” I think it’s now widely accepted that the backstop role is real. If that change is problematic for anyone, then add “real or” so it becomes “real or perceived backstop.” Regardless, it’s more than only perceived and I think that needs to be made explicit. The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role. Thanks, Keith From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:08 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org<mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
I would also suggest a slight rewording of this sentence in the text under "Progress" as follows: These definitions clarify the purposes of ICANN’s accountability, which include compliance to processes and applicable laws or key principles, achieving certain levels of performance and security, and ensuring that its decisions are for the benefit of the public, not just in the interests of a particular set of stakeholders or the corporation itself. Thanks, Robin On Jan 22, 2015, at 12:17 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
I agree with Keith on this point and see another related problem with the text (which I am only seeing now for the 1st time after the long journey home).
The document states that scope of our work is in seeing that ICANN "remains accountable" - but that is not really true. The reason this group was formed is because the community felt ICANN was inadequately accountable today. That is a big difference in scope. So we such just say "ICANN is accountable" because there isn't agreement that ICANN currently is accountable as the current text implies by using the word "remains" in the first sentence.
Thank you, Robin
On Jan 22, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
Thanks Alice.
I think the statement looks good.
I would ask the Co-Chairs for only one small (but meaningful) edit in the following sentence. Remove the word “perceived.” I think it’s now widely accepted that the backstop role is real. If that change is problematic for anyone, then add “real or” so it becomes “real or perceived backstop.” Regardless, it’s more than only perceived and I think that needs to be made explicit.
The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role.
Thanks, Keith
From: accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:08 AM To: accountability-cross-community@icann.org Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Colleagues, One of the scenarios I was considering as part of WS4 was unlike the rather heroic scenarios proposed by some contributors -- ICANN moves to an undisclosed location or gunmen menace members of some periodic review team -- suppose nothing happens? Why fail to consider a scenario of continuity and existing accountability mechanisms? There may be improvements we can recommend. I'm not agreeing with a suggestion to change the text to indicate ICANN isn't accountable, just not as accountable as some, myself included, would like. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon On 1/22/15 12:17 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
I agree with Keith on this point and see another related problem with the text (which I am only seeing now for the 1st time after the long journey home).
The document states that scope of our work is in seeing that ICANN "remains accountable" - but that is not really true. The reason this group was formed is because the community felt ICANN was inadequately accountable today. That is a big difference in scope. So we such just say "ICANN is accountable" because there isn't agreement that ICANN currently is accountable as the current text implies by using the word "remains" in the first sentence.
Thank you, Robin
On Jan 22, 2015, at 7:48 AM, Drazek, Keith wrote:
Thanks Alice. I think the statement looks good. I would ask the Co-Chairs for only one small (but meaningful) edit in the following sentence. Remove the word “perceived.” I think it’s now widely accepted that the backstop role is real. If that change is problematic for anyone, then add “real or” so it becomes “real or perceived backstop.” Regardless, it’s more than only perceived and I think that needs to be made explicit. The scope of the Enhancing ICANN Accountability process is defined as ensuring that ICANN remains accountable in the absence of its historical contractual relationship with the U.S. Government, and the perceived backstop with regard to ICANN's organization-wide accountability provided by that role. Thanks, Keith *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org>[mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces@icann.org]*On Behalf Of*Alice Jansen *Sent:*Thursday, January 22, 2015 8:08 AM *To:*accountability-cross-community@icann.org <mailto:accountability-cross-community@icann.org> *Subject:*[CCWG-ACCT] COMMENTS/EDITS by 17:00 UTC today - Draft statement - Frankfurt Meeting Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Editorial comment: The first sentence of the Background section could reasonably end after the word "Government". The subsequent comma and comment detract from the clarity of the scope statement. Eric Brunner-Williams Eugene, Oregon On 1/22/15 5:07 AM, Alice Jansen wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today – Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice
_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
Dear Alice, Sorry for the late response. I am fine fine the proposed text and support Keith refinements. Best, Giovanni Giovanni Seppia External Relations Manager EURid Woluwelaan 150 1831 Diegem - Belgium TEL: +32 (0) 2 401 2750 MOB:+39 335 8141733 giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu<mailto:giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu> http://www.eurid.eu<http://www.eurid.eu/> <http://christmas2014.eurid.eu> Please consider the environment before printing this email. <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry><https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry><https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry><https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> On 22 Jan 2015, at 14:07, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org<mailto:alice.jansen@icann.org>> wrote: Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt – 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by today – Thursday, 22 January - 17:00 UTC. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx>_______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org<mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community Disclaimer: This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses. http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer
I support the comments that robin and Keith d have made Best Jordan On Friday, 23 January 2015, Giovanni Seppia <Giovanni.Seppia@eurid.eu> wrote:
Dear Alice,
Sorry for the late response.
I am fine fine the proposed text and support Keith refinements.
Best,
Giovanni
Giovanni Seppia *External Relations Manager*
* EURid Woluwelaan 150 1831 Diegem - Belgium TEL: +32 (0) 2 401 2750 MOB:+39 335 8141733 giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','giovanni.seppia@eurid.eu');> http://www.eurid.eu <http://www.eurid.eu/> Please consider the environment before printing this email. <http://christmas2014.eurid.eu> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> <https://www.facebook.com/EUregistry> *
On 22 Jan 2015, at 14:07, Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','alice.jansen@icann.org');>> wrote:
Dear all, On behalf of the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs, please find attached a draft statement (Frankfurt - 19-20 January) for your consideration. Please flag any edits and/or comments you may have by* today - Thursday, 22 January - **17:00 UTC*. Thank you Best regards Alice <Draft statement - Frankfurt Mtg.docx> _______________________________________________ Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','Accountability-Cross-Community@icann.org');> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
*Disclaimer:* *This email and any attachment hereto is intended solely for the person to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this email in error, please delete it and immediately contact the sender by telephone or email, and destroy any copies of this information. You should not use or copy it, nor disclose its content to any other person or rely upon this information. Please note that any views presented in the email and any attachment hereto are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of EURid. While all care has been taken to avoid any known viruses, the recipient is advised to check this email and any attachment for presence of viruses.*
Other languages: English <http://www.eurid.eu/en/legal-disclaimer> Estonian <http://www.eurid.eu/et/legal-disclaimer> Italian <http://www.eurid.eu/it/legal-disclaimer> Maltese <http://www.eurid.eu/mt/legal-disclaimer> Romanian <http://www.eurid.eu/ro/legal-disclaimer> Swedish <http://www.eurid.eu/sv/legal-disclaimer> Czech <http://www.eurid.eu/cs/legal-disclaimer> Spanish <http://www.eurid.eu/es/legal-disclaimer> Latvian <http://www.eurid.eu/lv/legal-disclaimer> Dutch <http://www.eurid.eu/nl/legal-disclaimer> Slovak <http://www.eurid.eu/sk/legal-disclaimer> Greek <http://www.eurid.eu/el/legal-disclaimer> Danish <http://www.eurid.eu/da/legal-disclaimer> French <http://www.eurid.eu/fr/legal-disclaimer> Lithuanian <http://www.eurid.eu/lt/legal-disclaimer> Polish <http://www.eurid.eu/pl/legal-disclaimer> Slovenian <http://www.eurid.eu/sl/legal-disclaimer> Bulgarian <http://www.eurid.eu/bg/legal-disclaimer> German <http://www.eurid.eu/de/legal-disclaimer> Gaelic <http://www.eurid.eu/ga/legal-disclaimer> Hungarian <http://www.eurid.eu/hu/legal-disclaimer> Portuguese <http://www.eurid.eu/pt/legal-disclaimer> Finnish <http://www.eurid.eu/fi/legal-disclaimer> Croatian <http://www.eurid.eu/hr/legal-disclaimer> --
-- Jordan Carter Chief Executive, InternetNZ +64-21-442-649 | jordan@internetnz.net.nz Sent on the run, apologies for brevity
participants (15)
-
Alice Jansen -
Dr Eberhard Lisse -
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
-
Drazek, Keith -
Eric Brunner-Williams -
Giovanni Seppia -
James M. Bladel -
Jordan Carter -
Julia Katja Wolman -
Matthew Shears -
Robin Gross -
Roelof Meijer -
Seun Ojedeji -
Steve DelBianco -
Thomas Rickert